'We can provide the quality of service from under one roof' - Travers holds firm on one-site strategy
Newly reappointed Travers managing partner David Patient sets out his priorities for the next three years
February 13, 2018 at 04:22 AM
4 minute read
Looking forward to his second term as managing partner of City thoroughbred Travers Smith, David Patient says his focus is on "the holy trinity of people, space and technology".
While these issues face every law firm leader, Travers' one-site approach means that many of the remedies available to the competition – hundreds of paralegals in Manchester, for example – are off the table.
"So many firms have looked at alternative delivery options such as support centres in South Africa, Mumbai, Poland, Belfast or Manchester," says Patient, who was recently reappointed for a second three-year term at the helm of the firm. "But we think we can provide the quality of service from under one roof, and culturally it's very important for us to be one firm in that way," he says.
Patient argues that the firm can retain its competitive edge and profitability without changing its independent strategy.
"Our approach is to look at how we provide these services more efficiently in other ways, such as using technology efficiently, automation, making sure the right people are doing the right jobs, offering our people flexible and agile working arrangements, and relying on alumni," he says.
The firm has increased the number of paralegals it uses, but not at the expense of trainees, which it has held at around 25 a year. The firm is even looking to marginally increase that number, in contrast to the magic circle, which have slashed their trainee intakes in recent years.
"The competitiveness in the market to recruit the top people is intense, so when you recruit people you have to ensure that they buy into what you are doing, as well as your values," he says.
On the issues of space, Patient says that the firm is happy with its current Snow Street headquarters, which has undergone a recent refurbishment, but says future needs are harder to predict.
"The big question is: will you need the same amount of space you have today in five or 10 years' time?" he says.
Patient says the number of people recording time at the firm has grown very slightly over the last 12 months as the firm seeks to use technology to make its services more efficient.
However, he says that it "is hard to crystal ball gaze as to what your requirements will be halfway through a lease".
"But we do have flexibility about what we can do around some of the space we occupy. If we want more space or less space, we can have that – we have built that flexibility into our arrangements," he says.
The third element of Patient's "holy trinity", technology, is something the firm is examining in the light of how "it will change the way in which people work, their roles and perhaps ultimately the number of people at the firm".
The firm has been trialling artificial intelligence technology from rival providers RAVN and Kira over the last couple of years, but he says "the jury is still out" on which technology the firm will decide to adopt.
Travers enjoyed a successful 2016-17, with revenue rising 4% to £125m, and Patient says his goal for the current year is to "maintain the momentum and confidence we have got in our business and our model".
"We are focused on making working in a City law firm enjoyable, with high-quality people doing high-quality work for high-quality clients and in an environment where it is fun," he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250