HSBC profits boosted by $362m release in legal provisions, annual report reveals
Bank's profits benefit from net release of $362m in "settlements and provisions in connection with legal matters"
February 20, 2018 at 09:11 AM
3 minute read
HSBC added almost $400m to its profits last year from settlements and provisions connected to legal matters, according to the bank's latest annual report.
The report, released today (20 February), reveals that the bank more than doubled reported profit before tax to $17.2bn last year, with operating expenses falling by 12%.
According to the report, one contributor to this was "a net release of $362m in settlements and provisions in connection with legal matters", compared to charges of $681m in 2016 and $1.649bn in 2015.
The accounts also show that the bank had $1.5bn in provisions for legal proceedings and regulatory matters on 31 December 2017, compared with $2.4bn on 1 January that year.
HSBC has been involved in a number of major lawsuits in recent years, including litigation relating to its involvement in the liquidation of convicted fraudster Bernie Madoff's investment firm.
In the report, HSBC states: "Based upon the information currently available, management's estimate of the possible aggregate damages that might arise as a result of all claims in the various Madoff-related proceedings is up to or exceeding $500m."
The bank, which has paid out a number of fines over currency rate-rigging, has recognised a provision of $511m to cover foreign exchange rate investigations and litigation.
The report also confirms that HSBC has received requests for information from various regulatory and law enforcement authorities around the world relating to Mossack Fonseca, the law firm at the centre of the Panama Papers data leak. It states: "Based on the facts currently known, it is not practicable at this time for HSBC to predict the resolution of this matter, including the timing or any possible impact on HSBC, which could be significant."
Compensation for key management personnel is also detailed in the report, with the disclaimer that the role of chief legal officer did not meet the criteria for inclusion in these figures. HSBC's chief legal officer is former US government lawyer and litigator Stuart Levey, who succeeded Richard Bennett in the role in 2012.
HSBC finalised a review of its global panel of advisers at the end of 2016, with US firm Davis Polk & Wardwell winning a place on the roster alongside Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Linklaters and Norton Rose Fulbright.
HSBC's UK GC is Hugh Pugsley, who joined from Lloyds Bank in 2015. Last summer, the bank completed a UK panel review which saw CMS, Eversheds Sutherland, Pinsent Masons, Simmons & Simmons, Addleshaw Goddard and Dentons appointed to the line-up.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readGreenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250