Ministry of Defence cuts legal spend to top billing advisers as magic circle firms see fees fall
Linklaters, Freshfields and Slaughters among advisers to see MoD billings fall last year
February 21, 2018 at 05:42 AM
3 minute read
Legal fees for the Ministry of Defence's (MoD) biggest billers fell by more than 80% last year, as the government department cut back on spending to top UK law firms.
Figures obtained by a freedom of information request show the MoD's five biggest-billing law firms were paid 84% less in 2016-17 than the previous financial year.
Linklaters, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Slaughter and May, Simmons & Simmons and Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) – the five biggest MoD billers since 2013-14 looking at combined earnings – were paid a total of just £1.7m last year, compared with £10.6m in 2015-16.
Linklaters – the top-billing MoD adviser since 2013-14 – has been paid £13m in legal fees by the MoD in the last four financial years, but while it billed an average of more than £4m a year between 2013-14 and 2015-16, last year the firm earned just £852,000.
The magic circle firm has advised the MoD on numerous projects in recent years, including the production of the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers (pictured). The two warships will be the biggest ever built for the Royal Navy.
Simmons, the second highest-billing law firm over the same period, has earned a total of £8.3m for its advice, but also saw a significant drop in fees last year from £3.5m in 2015-16 to just £17,334. The firm has also handled a number of high-profile mandates for the ministry in recent years, including the financing for a training package that involved the delivery of a range of helicopters, infrastructure and ground-based training equipment.
HSF is the third highest UK top 50 biller during the period at £7.3m, followed by Freshfields on £4.4m and Slaughters with £3.2m.
In December 2014, the MoD appointed 10 firms to its major projects panel, with Linklaters, Simmons, HSF and Freshfields among those winning places. Between them, Linklaters and Simmons have billed more since then – £21.4m – than all other firms on the panel combined (£19.5m).
However, some of the smaller firms on the panel saw their MoD billings increase in 2016-17, including Mills & Reeve, which was the biggest earner from the MoD last year, billing £1.4m from the department, nearly £1m more than it did in 2015-16. Burges Salmon also saw an upturn in MoD fees last year, earning £621,378 after billing an average of about £150,000 in the previous years.
Despite not being a panel firm, Slaughters has been paid more by the MoD than the majority of the other firms on the major projects roster.
Other non-panel firms to have billed more than £1m during the past three years include BLM (£2m), Squire Patton Boggs (£2.2m) and Scots firm Morton Fraser (£1.9m).
In a statement, the MoD said: "It may be helpful to explain some of the reasons that potentially give rise to a variation in legal costs on a yearly basis. These will include, but are not limited to, the fact that procurement projects require more support at certain stages than others and the number of projects may either increase or decrease over the years.
"Additionally, last year the MoD switched to a new commercial procurement system, which may have caused a delay in some payments being submitted and processed. Overall, however, the MoD external legal support is only sought when there is a business requirement that cannot be met internally."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![US Sued Over Trump Administration's USAID Stop-Work Orders US Sued Over Trump Administration's USAID Stop-Work Orders](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/16/79/000bb9704808a73fcde73947ecfd/trump-oval-office-767x633.jpg)
![X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns
![U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ea/56/920bdb1d42d59b3af46660326473/us-china-flags-767x633.jpg)
U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers Label WTO Dispute Pointless, Clients Have Their Hands Tied
![German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250