Barclays to law firms: no more panel reviews
Bank to rate advisers with new 'active relationship management' system following final official review
February 22, 2018 at 08:48 AM
3 minute read
Barclays is set to begin its last-ever conventional panel review, as it aims to move away from "resetting the clock every two years" with a new system that will see external advisers assessed on an ongoing basis.
The bank, which handed two-year panel appointments to 140 firms in its last review in July 2016, will carry out its last official refresh in the coming months, after which it will move to a new system it describes as "active relationship management".
Once the next – and last – review has been completed, firms will be added or removed from the panel on an ad hoc basis.
Following the 2016 review, Barclays implemented a number of changes to how it manages relationships with its law firms. This included the creation of a rating system grading panel firms on a number of metrics, including billing rates, service delivery and alternative fee arrangements, as well as feedback gathered from the bank's in-house lawyers.
Barclays' head of external engagement Stephanie Hamon said: "This is going to be our last official panel refresh, because we have seen and demonstrated how active relationship management is actually delivering far more benefits for both the in-house and external legal teams. Therefore we are going to dispense with a panel process entirely."
If you keep resetting the clock every two years, you can't really build relationships
Chris Grant, the bank's head of relationship management, added: "We are assessing firms against a few metrics. One is looking at their service delivery, such as the way they engage on a regular basis with our lawyers, and the way they interact with Barclays versus the cost element."
The grades – which are currently assessed annually – are not fixed, and firms will be encouraged to take on board feedback to improve their score.
"[The grading system] gives you a point of conversation to develop relationships," said Grant. "If you have firms sitting in one of the lower categories, it won't prevent them from securing work or unnecessarily penalise them. Instead, it is a way of being able to develop and improve the relationship. Ultimately, from our perspective, we would like help all firms become A-rated firms."
Hamon concluded: "Panel refreshes are not supporting what we want to do. What we really want is our relationships to be a win-win partnership and for us all to develop. If you keep resetting the clock every two years, you can't really build those relationships."
Barclays' last panel review saw it cut its panel by around 60% from around 350-400 to 140 firms, with no new firms joining the list.
Ashurst, Hogan Lovells, Simmons & Simmons, Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds, Bond Dickinson, DWF and Reed Smith were among those retaining spots on the roster, which is split into three tiers – panel firm, core specialist firm and specialist firm.
The bank declined to comment on the likely structure of the next panel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance, Milbank Steer Yondr Group’s $900M Debt Financing in Malaysia
Kirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readKirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readVenezuela Faces Creditor Class Action Suit After Missing $1.5B Bond Payments
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250