Ex-Simmons and Linklaters associates on building a $10m business and selling legal tech to 'bemused' lawyers
Former Simmons lawyer and entrepreneur Stephen Scanlan on the rise of legal tech and why law firms need to be less conservative
February 25, 2018 at 07:15 PM
5 minute read
As a rule, law firms and those working inside them are not known for taking risks. As a result, there aren't too many who've managed to build up multimillion-pound businesses on the side.
Former Simmons & Simmons lawyer turned entrepreneur Stephen Scanlan (pictured), however, has done just that, and is now on a mission to encourage firms to embrace new technology and innovation.
Scanlan set up his own legal tech business, XRef Software Solutions – which helps law firms draft documents more quickly and accurately – in 2009 while still working at Simmons. Seven years later, he sold the business for $10m (£7.25m) via a merger with US rival Microsystems.
"Some things have really changed – although firms are still conservative about investment in new products, there are dedicated teams investigating what opportunities are out there in terms of innovation," says Scanlan. "Big law firms now have innovation teams set up which didn't exist five years ago, and often they have lawyers as the head of innovation. That, in my mind, is key."
While working at Simmons, Scanlan poured his disposable income and limited free time into setting up the proofreading tool. He brought in co-founder and former Linklaters lawyer and Merrill Lynch hedge fund trader Travis Leon to work on the business development side.
Law firms give language training, such as Arabic and Spanish lessons – so why not teach a programming language?
Leon recalls: "We both continued our day jobs while further developing the product and testing the market with the prototype. Eventually, I took the frightful plunge, leaving the security of City life to go full-time on the business. Although scary, there was also an allure and some excitement in taking on the challenge of a tech startup."
Scanlan adds: "Back in 2009, I think the idea of legal tech was met with a somewhat bemused look, so trying to break into to the legal market as a startup was very difficult. Firms were reluctant to deal with a startup with no track record."
Scanlan says more law firms are taking legal tech seriously, although he adds they could do more to help lawyers be more innovative.
"Law firms currently give language training, such as Arabic and Spanish lessons – so why not teach a programming language? That could help innovation and the way lawyers think – drafting a contract is similar to programming a program."
For other associates tempted to start their own legal tech business, Scanlan has a few pieces of advice.
"If I could have done something differently I would have gone faster, harder and raised funding more quickly. If you have an idea you believe in, go quickly as competitors will creep in. In hindsight, I went slowly – which meant I came to market at the same time as a competitor, whereas I could have got it off the ground a year earlier."
XRef launched publicly in 2012, just weeks before the co-founders became aware of a serious US competitor and their ultimate merger partner – Microsystems. Meanwhile, in the UK, data provider LexisNexis launched its own document proofreading tool LexisDraft the following year.
"I would also say that you are going to be risking your time, and emotional energy, so I would be cautious about investing a huge amount of your own money as well. If you are feeling financially stressed you might not go for the right decisions at the right time.
"I was tens of thousands of pounds in debt and an associate salary is tens of thousand pounds gross. Before we had any external funding, the cashflow of the company was funded out of my salary, and then also by my two co-founders' salaries."
Scanlan has now turned his attention to a new business proposal that he says will more directly impact law firms' profits. The business is still in the early development stages. "Proofreading products like XRef don't necessarily go to the bottom line of a law firm, in a direct sense. My new one is about time recording. If a firm has more billable hours done on paper they should make more money from it."
In his view, law firms need to "get the workflows right" first before moving on to more advanced artificial intelligence technology. "In top 20 firms I think there are certain parts that will be using programs that claim to be using AI, but we are so far away from having AI lawyers. All they mean by that is we sort data quickly with set rules – this is not the AI you see in science fiction."
- This year's Strategic Technology Forum will once again take place at the Grand Hotel Des Iles Borromees, Lake Maggiore, Italy on 20-22 June. Key topics will include how law firms can defeat the competition to attract the best talent, as well as how to adapt and engage with alternative providers taking a more significant place in the legal market. Please click here to view the full conference programme and book your place.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250