Ex-Simmons and Linklaters associates on building a $10m business and selling legal tech to 'bemused' lawyers
Former Simmons lawyer and entrepreneur Stephen Scanlan on the rise of legal tech and why law firms need to be less conservative
February 25, 2018 at 07:15 PM
5 minute read
As a rule, law firms and those working inside them are not known for taking risks. As a result, there aren't too many who've managed to build up multimillion-pound businesses on the side.
Former Simmons & Simmons lawyer turned entrepreneur Stephen Scanlan (pictured), however, has done just that, and is now on a mission to encourage firms to embrace new technology and innovation.
Scanlan set up his own legal tech business, XRef Software Solutions – which helps law firms draft documents more quickly and accurately – in 2009 while still working at Simmons. Seven years later, he sold the business for $10m (£7.25m) via a merger with US rival Microsystems.
"Some things have really changed – although firms are still conservative about investment in new products, there are dedicated teams investigating what opportunities are out there in terms of innovation," says Scanlan. "Big law firms now have innovation teams set up which didn't exist five years ago, and often they have lawyers as the head of innovation. That, in my mind, is key."
While working at Simmons, Scanlan poured his disposable income and limited free time into setting up the proofreading tool. He brought in co-founder and former Linklaters lawyer and Merrill Lynch hedge fund trader Travis Leon to work on the business development side.
Law firms give language training, such as Arabic and Spanish lessons – so why not teach a programming language?
Leon recalls: "We both continued our day jobs while further developing the product and testing the market with the prototype. Eventually, I took the frightful plunge, leaving the security of City life to go full-time on the business. Although scary, there was also an allure and some excitement in taking on the challenge of a tech startup."
Scanlan adds: "Back in 2009, I think the idea of legal tech was met with a somewhat bemused look, so trying to break into to the legal market as a startup was very difficult. Firms were reluctant to deal with a startup with no track record."
Scanlan says more law firms are taking legal tech seriously, although he adds they could do more to help lawyers be more innovative.
"Law firms currently give language training, such as Arabic and Spanish lessons – so why not teach a programming language? That could help innovation and the way lawyers think – drafting a contract is similar to programming a program."
For other associates tempted to start their own legal tech business, Scanlan has a few pieces of advice.
"If I could have done something differently I would have gone faster, harder and raised funding more quickly. If you have an idea you believe in, go quickly as competitors will creep in. In hindsight, I went slowly – which meant I came to market at the same time as a competitor, whereas I could have got it off the ground a year earlier."
XRef launched publicly in 2012, just weeks before the co-founders became aware of a serious US competitor and their ultimate merger partner – Microsystems. Meanwhile, in the UK, data provider LexisNexis launched its own document proofreading tool LexisDraft the following year.
"I would also say that you are going to be risking your time, and emotional energy, so I would be cautious about investing a huge amount of your own money as well. If you are feeling financially stressed you might not go for the right decisions at the right time.
"I was tens of thousands of pounds in debt and an associate salary is tens of thousand pounds gross. Before we had any external funding, the cashflow of the company was funded out of my salary, and then also by my two co-founders' salaries."
Scanlan has now turned his attention to a new business proposal that he says will more directly impact law firms' profits. The business is still in the early development stages. "Proofreading products like XRef don't necessarily go to the bottom line of a law firm, in a direct sense. My new one is about time recording. If a firm has more billable hours done on paper they should make more money from it."
In his view, law firms need to "get the workflows right" first before moving on to more advanced artificial intelligence technology. "In top 20 firms I think there are certain parts that will be using programs that claim to be using AI, but we are so far away from having AI lawyers. All they mean by that is we sort data quickly with set rules – this is not the AI you see in science fiction."
- This year's Strategic Technology Forum will once again take place at the Grand Hotel Des Iles Borromees, Lake Maggiore, Italy on 20-22 June. Key topics will include how law firms can defeat the competition to attract the best talent, as well as how to adapt and engage with alternative providers taking a more significant place in the legal market. Please click here to view the full conference programme and book your place.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250