Weil sets new records as PEP rises 18% and London revenues shoot up 33%
Global revenues grow nearly 10% to reach new high after record year for US firm
February 26, 2018 at 12:21 PM
4 minute read
Weil Gotshal & Manges enjoyed a record year in 2017, with revenue reaching new heights, profits per equity partner (PEP) seeing double-digit growth and London turnover surging by 33%.
Firmwide revenues rose 9.8% to $1.39bn, while PEP grew 17.8% to $3.64m. Even as the firm's lawyer headcount and equity partner ranks swelled, revenue per lawyer grew 6.3% to $1.24m.
In London, the US firm generated about $165.4m (£118.5m) in revenue last year – a near 33% increase. A slowdown related to Brexit uncertainty "cleared itself up in 2017", but the main driver for the revenue growth was "obtaining more market share", according to executive partner Barry Wolf.
"These clearly are records for Weil", said Wolf. "We are very pleased with our performance in London, which was driven mainly by our obtaining more market share in this highly competitive space."
Combined with its 2016 results, Weil's profits per partner have increased about 44% in the last two years, Wolf noted.
The past two years stand in contrast to a period of sluggish revenue growth for Weil from 2010 to 2015. In 2013, the firm announced a series of cost-cutting measures, including layoffs and pay cuts for some partners.
But more than four years later, Wolf credits a long-term vision for the firm's sharp comeback. He said its 2017 growth can be attributed to the successful implementation of a 2011 strategy that entailed gaining strength and market share in core practices – including bankruptcy, corporate and litigation – in the US and overseas.
"Our strategy is to keep that balance going, It's not to have one practice dominate the other," Wolf said, adding: "I don't see major investments in new offices or practice areas."
Weil saw demand increase in 2017 across all three of its core practices, Wolf said, as well as increased demand outside the US. Billing rate increases were a factor in the revenue rise, Wolf acknowledged, as they have been for many New York firms. But the firm's revenue growth was principally driven by hikes in demand, Wolf said, noting that the number of hours billed by lawyers rose 3%.
The firm's expenses last year also rose, but revenue grew faster, helping the firm achieve a 21% increase in net income.
Wolf said any savings from the firm closing its Dubai office were minimal, as that office had just three lawyers, while the firm's decision to pull out of Budapest only took effect this month. When asked if the firm will see any more office closings, Wolf answered cautiously: "We constantly look at whether offices make sense or not."
"Clearly with respect to Dubai and Budapest," he said, "it didn't make any strategic sense."
Meanwhile, the firm increased total headcount about 3% to 1,118 lawyers, and added five more equity partners to its ranks. Associate headcount rose to nearly 778, but still stands far below the roughly 850 associates the firm employed in 2012, before its staff reduction.
Wolf said the firm does not aspire to any specific headcount but follows demand. "We will grow as far as the demand is there," he said.
Weil's work on some of the largest deals and bankruptcies last year helped drive its numbers to their record levels. The firm said it advised on more than 80 transactions valued at more than $1bn apiece, including advising a transaction committee of Reynolds American on its $49bn merger with British American Tobacco and advising Scripps Networks in a $14.6bn merger with Discovery Communications.
Other deals included advising Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Merrill Lynch in providing $13.7bn committed bridge financing to Amazon for its acquisition of Whole Foods Market. The firm also advised Barclays, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Merrill Lynch in providing $49bn of financing commitments to CVS Health to finance its acquisition of Aetna.
Weil's well-known restructuring practice was involved in some of the largest bankruptcy cases in the last year, including Takata, Westinghouse Electric on its $9.8bn Chapter 11 case, and Tidewater in its $2bn case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250