Linklaters joins new project to define future of smart contracts
Firm joins Dentons and DLA Piper on working group aiming to set standards for financial-based smart contracts
February 28, 2018 at 10:57 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Linklaters has signed up to a new initiative aiming to bring together a consortium of legal and technology partners to help promote open standards around smart contracts.
Richard Hay, the UK head of fintech at Linklaters, said the firm was eager to join the initiative – dubbed the Accord Project – because it is looking to "instil in our lawyers a sense that this is a time of significant technological advance, and that some aspects of contracts that are currently written in prose may ultimately be written in some form of machine-readable text".
He added: "We are looking to empower our lawyers to make the most of these technologies and the technological advances that they entail."
Linklaters has been involved in smart contract and blockchain-related endeavours prior to joining the Accord Project. The firm recently issued a joint white paper with the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, exploring the use of blockchain-enabled contracts for derivative-based financial transactions.
Linklaters has also run "a number coding workshops for lawyers" that educate its own lawyers about smart contracts and blockchain-enabled automation, Hay said.
The firm will join the Accord Project as a member of its financial services working group, where it will help define standards for smart contracts in the financial industry. Hay noted that the during the past "two or three years, we have seen most interest in blockchain and smart contracts" come from the financial sector, and that interest is now "spilling over into our broader corporate client base".
The Accord Project was founded by Dentons-backed internet of things-enabled contract startup Clause, and already has a host of other law firm partners including Dentons, Holland & Knight, DLA Piper, and BakerHostetler.
The project also counts tech organisations such as Hyperledger, the International Association for Contract & Commercial Management and, more recently, the Open Identity Exchange, as partners as well.
Peter Hunn, CEO of Clause, previously told Legaltech News that the goal of the Accord Project is "to start setting some standards around what the technology will look like, so that law firms and other users can become acquainted with it".
Houman Shadab, co-founder of Clause, previously told Legaltech News that although the term "smart contracts" is often linked to blockchain, the Accord Project will aim to take a much broader view of what such contracts can entail.
"Definitely there is a need to consolidate what we mean by smart contracts and bring it back under the rubric of legally enforceable and automated technology. That may or may not be implemented with a blockchain," he noted.
Indeed, smart contracts may not entail fully automated contracts. Hay noted that though "most financial contracts have clauses that at the moment would be more susceptible to being automated", there is still a fair amount of clauses that do not lend themselves well to automation.
While the "the holy grail is ultimately" a fully automated contract, Hay said it is far more realistic at this time to consider automation in a piecemeal fashion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
Pinsent Masons Launches AML Artificial Intelligence Tool in Wake of SRA Crackdown
3 minute readGowling WLG’s Commitment to AI and Innovation Attracts New Director of AI
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 2Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
- 3FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 4Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 5How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250