Why we're writing about men on International Women's Day
Focusing on men on International Women's Day may sound counter-intuitive, but here's why we're doing just that
March 08, 2018 at 08:02 AM
3 minute read
For more than 100 years, International Women's Day has celebrated the achievements of women and pushed for gender parity. But this year, we've chosen to focus our main feature on the role that men need to play in actually achieving this within the legal profession.
Some may question why we are taking this approach, when men already have ample opportunity to get their voice heard within the profession. The answer to this is quite simple – as men hold the vast majority of leadership roles within law firms, the onus has got to be on them to drive real change.
However, as the revelations of recent months have highlighted, men have clearly been a large part of the problem when it comes to the progress of women in law – as in other industries. Witness the sexual assault scandal at Baker McKenzie, or our survey which found that some two thirds of female lawyers have experienced sexual harassment while working within law firms.
But now it's time for men to be part of the solution, and more and more firms are waking up to this fact – as acknowledged by many of those spoken to for today's feature.
Yes, law absolutely needs more female role models at partnership, and especially leadership, level. A lot more. The fact the magic circle firms look no closer to having a female managing or senior partner between them now than they did when I joined Legal Week 12 years ago remains a depressing reality. Even more depressing is Ashurst partner Simon Beddow's assertion that little has changed in his 29 years in the profession.
But while the number of female role models remains far smaller than it should be, male partners have a duty to help rectify the problem.
During the coming days, we will be running a series of Q&A interviews between mentors and mentees looking at just that. From partners at Allen & Overy to DLA Piper, growing numbers of male partners are attempting to understand what it is really like to walk in the shoes of a more junior female lawyer.
It's likely that each change that results from these efforts will not sound radical. Changing work allocation so that it isn't biased, rethinking networking opportunities and ensuring access to coaching and mentoring, for example, do not sound the most groundbreaking ideas in the world.
But, little by little, they will help. On the back of movements like #MeToo, Time's Up and, to a lesser extent, the attention brought through the new gender pay gap reporting requirements, there has never been as good a time as now to press for progress.
There's still a long way to go before law achieves anything close to gender parity, but at least firms are now moving on from empty platitudes to more tangible initiatives. And the fact that some clients are starting to hold them to account if they don't deal with the disparity will clearly help.
So let's hope we're not still having this debate in another 12 years, and that at some point soon the patronage of men will no longer be necessary for women to reach the heights they deserve.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250