Blake Morgan and Deutsche turn to ADR to resolve bank's £8.4m negligence claim against firm
Professional negligence dispute moves to mediation after bank claims firm did not exercise "care, skill and diligence"
March 09, 2018 at 04:10 AM
4 minute read
Blake Morgan and Deutsche Bank are attempting to resolve an £8.4m professional negligence claim via alternative dispute resolution (ADR), after the bank took legal action against the law firm last year over a disputed property deed.
Deutsche alleges that Blake Morgan was negligent when advising on a deed of surrender intended to release the bank from its obligations towards a data centre in Middlesex.
The bank claims that the law firm acted negligently by failing to advise that surrendering the lease to the centre required the consent of the Co-operative Bank, which had not been granted, and that as a result, "Deutsche Bank was not released from its liability to pay rent" on the property.
Deutsche alleges that the firm did not exercise "care, skill and diligence". The bank is claiming damages for any sums that it would have recovered under the lease, as well as costs incurred in dealing with the ineffective surrender.
Deutsche estimates that it would have been entitled to recover £6.1m, and that it has incurred costs of £2.3m and $60,000.
The bank is being advised by Freshfield Bruckhaus Deringer disputes partner Christopher Robinson, who has instructed Sonia Tolaney QC and Adam Rushworth of One Essex Court. Blake Morgan has turned to Clyde & Co, with 4 New Square's Scott Allen instructed as counsel.
According to the particulars of claim filed by Freshfields last year, Blake Morgan has "admitted liability in correspondence but has 'reserved its position' on causation, loss and mitigation".
The case was stayed for a period of 14 days earlier this year, during which time Deutsche and Blake Morgan began attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation, which are ongoing.
According to one senior City litigator, ADR is becoming increasingly common in complex commercial cases, with courts taking a stronger line on pushing parties to pursue a solution via mediation.
"It is in the interest of the court because it frees up court and judge time, and it is in the interest of the parties involved because it is often better to negotiate a settlement that resolves the dispute, rather than having an outcome that is favourable to one side and damaging to the other," he said. "It also saves on legal costs for both the claimant and defendant."
In a statement, Blake Morgan said: "The firm naturally regrets the difficulties this has caused to one of our longstanding and valued clients.
"We have no doubt that the case will be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. In the meantime, no further comment will be made given that the parties are subject to legal proceedings and it would, therefore, be inappropriate to discuss in any media forum."
Blake Morgan, which ranked 50th in Legal Week's 2016-17 UK top 50, is also currently embroiled in a high-profile dispute over south London football club Dulwich Hamlet's Champion Hill stadium.
The club claims it is being forced out of the stadium by its owners, Meadow Partners. A letter from Blake Morgan on behalf of Greendales IP, a subsidiary of Meadow, stating that the 'Dulwich Hamlet Football Club' name has been trademarked, has gone viral on social media, attracting the attention of celebrities such as Gary Lineker and Danny Baker.
In a statement, Blake Morgan said: "We were asked to provide advice on trade mark law as part of our client's complex discussions about land at Champion Hill. We're aware commercial conversations between Meadow Partners and Dulwich Hamlet FC are ongoing, but are not party to these and cannot comment further."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250