Blake Morgan and Deutsche turn to ADR to resolve bank's £8.4m negligence claim against firm
Professional negligence dispute moves to mediation after bank claims firm did not exercise "care, skill and diligence"
March 09, 2018 at 04:10 AM
4 minute read
Blake Morgan and Deutsche Bank are attempting to resolve an £8.4m professional negligence claim via alternative dispute resolution (ADR), after the bank took legal action against the law firm last year over a disputed property deed.
Deutsche alleges that Blake Morgan was negligent when advising on a deed of surrender intended to release the bank from its obligations towards a data centre in Middlesex.
The bank claims that the law firm acted negligently by failing to advise that surrendering the lease to the centre required the consent of the Co-operative Bank, which had not been granted, and that as a result, "Deutsche Bank was not released from its liability to pay rent" on the property.
Deutsche alleges that the firm did not exercise "care, skill and diligence". The bank is claiming damages for any sums that it would have recovered under the lease, as well as costs incurred in dealing with the ineffective surrender.
Deutsche estimates that it would have been entitled to recover £6.1m, and that it has incurred costs of £2.3m and $60,000.
The bank is being advised by Freshfield Bruckhaus Deringer disputes partner Christopher Robinson, who has instructed Sonia Tolaney QC and Adam Rushworth of One Essex Court. Blake Morgan has turned to Clyde & Co, with 4 New Square's Scott Allen instructed as counsel.
According to the particulars of claim filed by Freshfields last year, Blake Morgan has "admitted liability in correspondence but has 'reserved its position' on causation, loss and mitigation".
The case was stayed for a period of 14 days earlier this year, during which time Deutsche and Blake Morgan began attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation, which are ongoing.
According to one senior City litigator, ADR is becoming increasingly common in complex commercial cases, with courts taking a stronger line on pushing parties to pursue a solution via mediation.
"It is in the interest of the court because it frees up court and judge time, and it is in the interest of the parties involved because it is often better to negotiate a settlement that resolves the dispute, rather than having an outcome that is favourable to one side and damaging to the other," he said. "It also saves on legal costs for both the claimant and defendant."
In a statement, Blake Morgan said: "The firm naturally regrets the difficulties this has caused to one of our longstanding and valued clients.
"We have no doubt that the case will be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. In the meantime, no further comment will be made given that the parties are subject to legal proceedings and it would, therefore, be inappropriate to discuss in any media forum."
Blake Morgan, which ranked 50th in Legal Week's 2016-17 UK top 50, is also currently embroiled in a high-profile dispute over south London football club Dulwich Hamlet's Champion Hill stadium.
The club claims it is being forced out of the stadium by its owners, Meadow Partners. A letter from Blake Morgan on behalf of Greendales IP, a subsidiary of Meadow, stating that the 'Dulwich Hamlet Football Club' name has been trademarked, has gone viral on social media, attracting the attention of celebrities such as Gary Lineker and Danny Baker.
In a statement, Blake Morgan said: "We were asked to provide advice on trade mark law as part of our client's complex discussions about land at Champion Hill. We're aware commercial conversations between Meadow Partners and Dulwich Hamlet FC are ongoing, but are not party to these and cannot comment further."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250