Slaughters gender pay gap report reveals female associates are paid more than men
Slaughters becomes third magic circle firm to publish gender pay gap report after A&O and Linklaters
March 14, 2018 at 06:21 AM
2 minute read
Slaughter and May and Ashurst have become the latest firms to file their gender pay gap figures, with Slaughters' report revealing that its female associates receive higher salaries and more bonus pay than their male counterparts.
The firm's report states that its female associates are paid on average 2.1% more than men, with average bonus pay for women 2.7% higher than male associates.
However, when looking at all non-partner employees, the firm's pay gap for all staff is 14.3% in favour of men, with a bonus gap of 33.3%.
Slaughters' figures compare favourably to magic circle rivals Linklaters and Allen & Overy, both of which have published their data in recent weeks, reporting pay gaps of 23.2% and 19.8% respectively.
Slaughters' report also includes a breakdown of business services roles, although these figures exclude secretarial positions, which at most law firms are typically held almost exclusively by women. The firm found that by removing secretaries from the business services figures, there is actually a 7.6% pay gap in favour of women and a 5% bonus gap in favour of women.
Executive partner Paul Stacey said: "Our analysis of the underlying figures shows that our one-firm culture remains strong, with the gender pay gap for associates and business services professionals yielding encouraging results. That culture values remunerating our employees in a less differentiated and more egalitarian way, and is supported by no billable hours targets."
The proportion of male and female staff who received a bonus is almost identical, at 92.2% and 91.6% respectively.
The firm's lowest-paid employees are mostly female, with 72.3% of the bottom quartile of earners made up of women.
Meanwhile, Ashurst's gender pay gap data shows that its female staff are paid 24.8% less on average while they also receive 64.4% less in average bonus pay.
In addition, 44.3% of male staff took home a bonus compared to 34.1% of women.
Looking at legal staff only, the gender pay gap stands at 16.4% in favour of men, while female lawyers also receive 62.6% less in bonus pay on average.
The latest disclosures come three weeks before the 4 April reporting deadline for all organisations employing more than 250 people. To date, about one third of the UK top 50 have published their figures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All“I Bought a £20 Suit From eBay”: How a Social Mobility Scheme Helped Launch a Paul Weiss Associate’s Career
6 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250