Reed Smith goes beyond pay gap reporting requirements with details of partner earnings
US firm reveals female equity partners are paid more than their male counterparts, although bonuses for women still fall short
March 20, 2018 at 06:53 AM
3 minute read
Reed Smith has published details of its UK gender pay gap, becoming one of the first firms to include partner figures in its reporting.
The US firm's report reveals that while male partners are paid on average just 0.83% more than their female counterparts, female UK partners received on average 21.5% less in bonuses.
Law firms are not required to include partners in their gender pay gap reporting, but Reed Smith said it had decided it was important to look into the pay gap at partner level as "the firm's commitment to gender equality applies to all levels of seniority within the firm".
The report does not state what proportion of male and female partners took home a bonus, but specifies that it has a 77% male UK partnership.
Notably, the firm states that the average hourly rate of pay for female equity partners is actually higher than that of male equity partners, although no specific details are provided.
The firm's overall pay gap for all UK employees is 14.8% in favour of men, with male staff on average receiving 27.1% more in bonuses, although the report states that 5% more female employees took home a bonus during the year – 76.9% compared to 71.9% of men.
Business services, fee earner, secretarial support and associate roles at the firm are all occupied by more women than men. Fifty-nine percent of associates at the firm are women, while 56% of both fee earning and business services roles are held by female employees, and 100% of secretaries at the firm are women.
However, women hold 50% of the firm's senior management positions.
The report states: "Our figures tell us that women are reaching partnership and within that, equity partnership, and that those reaching these positions are being fairly rewarded without reference to gender.
"We have seen improvement over the past five years, but we will not rest until the gender pay gap is zero."
Reed Smith's report comes two weeks before the 4 April reporting deadline for all UK organisations employing more than 250 people, a threshold the US firm passes due to its significant London presence.
Fellow US firm White & Case also recently published its gender pay gap report, revealing that UK male employees are paid on average 24% more than women. Forty-six percent of male staff received a bonus, compared to 44% of women, with average bonus pay 45% in favour of men.
As with almost all other law firms, White & Case argued that the gender pay gap is driven by the fact that secretarial staff are "almost exclusively" female, while women are underrepresented in senior roles, an issue the firm said it has been "working to address for many years" with initiatives such as coaching, mentoring and unconscious bias training.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250