DLA gender pay report shows 54% bonus gap as Norton Rose releases partner compensation details
Firm's gender pay gap report shows male employees are paid 17.8% more than women
March 23, 2018 at 06:53 AM
3 minute read
DLA Piper has revealed that its male staff are, on average, paid bonuses 53.6% higher than women in the firm's UK gender pay gap report, released yesterday (21 March).
However, when taking the median average, DLA is able to report a 0% bonus gap, a result the firm says is down to "a large population of business services employees receiving an equal, fixed end-of-year bonus amount".
The firm's mean bonus gap is larger than the average of about 30% reported by other UK top 50 firms to date, although the report also shows that more female staff (58.8%) received a bonus than men (53.3%).
Overall, the firm has a mean average pay gap of 17.8% in favour of men. This is higher than the 13.9% gap reported by Freshfields, but below magic circle firms Allen & Overy and Linklaters, which reported 19.8% and 23.2% respectively.
Women make up the majority of employees in all quartiles with the exception of the upper quartile, which is 51% male, with women making up 72% of the firm's lowest-paid quartile.
In a statement released with the report, DLA UK managing partner Sandra Wallace (pictured) said: "We were pleased to be able to show that men and women are equally distributed within the top salary quartile, indicating a relatively equal gender split in the highest paid roles, however there is more work to be done to ensure we strive for a good gender balance at all levels of our organisation."
Norton Rose Fulbright has also published its UK gender pay gap report, becoming one of a small but growing group of law firms to reveal details of partner compensation.
The firm's report reveals than on average, female partners receive 38% more in bonuses than men. However, men are still paid a mean average of 19% more than their female counterparts. The firm's analysis is based on UK partners only and includes all partners in management positions.
Among associates, the pay gap is 0.5% in favour of female associates, although male associates receive on average 5% more in bonuses than women.
Among all other employees – including business services staff, secretarial staff and trainees – men are paid on average 25.5% more than women, with average bonus pay 56% higher than female staff.
When employees and partners are combined, the firm's overall mean gender pay gap is 49% in favour of men, with men paid an average of 61.4% more in bonuses, a result the firm attributed to "the relatively low number of female partners at the senior end of the partnership".
Women also dominate the lowest-paid quartile of staff at the firm, with female employees making up 75% of the group, although within this quartile women are paid on average 15.3% more than their male equivalents.
Other UK top 50 firms to have released their gender pay gap reports include Macfarlanes – where hourly pay for male staff is on average 16.5% higher than for women – and Reed Smith, which went beyond reporting requirements by including details of partner earnings.
The US firm's report revealed that while male partners are paid on average just 0.83% more than female partners, female UK partners received on average 21.5% less in bonuses.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All“I Bought a £20 Suit From eBay”: How a Social Mobility Scheme Helped Launch a Paul Weiss Associate’s Career
6 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 122-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
- 2Judge Rejects Walgreens' Contractual Dispute Against Founder's Family Member
- 3FTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
- 4Greenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
- 5DC Circuit Rejects Jan. 6 Defendants’ Claim That Pepper Spray Isn't Dangerous Weapon
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250