Allen & Overy called to appear before MPs in inquiry into abuse of non-disclosure agreements
A&O partner to appear before select committee after revelations of firm's role in Weinstein NDA
March 26, 2018 at 05:28 AM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) partner Mark Mansell has been called to appear before the Women and Equalities Committee this week, after the revelation of the firm's historic role in a settlement over claims of sexual harassment made against disgraced movie producer Harvey Weinstein.
The magic circle firm was brought in to advise Miramax, which Weinstein co-founded, when the producer's then-assistant Zelda Perkins accused him of sexual harassment in 1998.
A&O's role – which was detailed in a Financial Times article published last year – saw the firm draw up a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) as part of the settlement between Weinstein and Perkins, who was advised by City firm Simons Muirhead & Burton.
Simons Muirhead partner Tamara Ludlow has also been called to appear before the select committee alongside Mansell.
Both law firms have refused requests to provide a copy of the NDA to the committee. According to the committee, the request was declined because Weinstein has refused permission to release it.
In a statement, A&O said: "Mark Mansell has been invited by the Women and Equalities Committee to give evidence for an inquiry into sexual harassment in the workplace. The inquiry is looking into the advantages and disadvantages of using non-disclosure agreements in sexual harassment cases. Mark has been asked to give evidence in his capacity as one of the country's leading employment lawyers with relevant expertise."
The 11-member committee, chaired by Maria Miller MP, is investigating the use of non-disclosure agreements relating to allegations of sexual harassment in the workplace.
Mansell and Ludlow are due to attend the session at 10:20am on Wednesday (28 March).
Perkins will also be providing evidence, alongside Max Winthrop, the chair of the Law Society's employment law committee; Suzanne McKie QC, the founder of Farore Law, which specialises in sex discrimination, sexual harassment, equal pay and sexual assault; and Gareth Brahams, chair of the Employment Lawyers Association and managing partner at employment firm Brahams Dutt Badrick French.
In a statement, the committee said: "Non-disclosure agreements is a catch-all term for agreements that include confidentiality clauses – sometimes referred to as gagging clauses.
"There has been criticism of their use in sexual harassment cases, with concerns that they may be used to conceal improper, discriminatory or even illegal behaviour, or to impede reporting of such behaviour to the proper authorities."
Earlier this month, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) warned law firms in England and Wales not to use NDAs to prevent the reporting of professional misconduct within their own businesses, in the wake of several sexual harassment scandals that have rocked the profession.
The SRA issued a warning notice reminding firms that any potential professional misconduct by a person or firm should be reported to the regulator, including sexual harassment or misconduct.
Allegations of misconduct have emerged at a number of major law firms in recent months, as more and more women come forward to report examples of inappropriate behaviour. Last week, Latham & Watkins chair and managing partner Bill Voge resigned from the firm after admitting to "communications of a sexual nature".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250