Pinsents restates pay gap data and calls for firms to agree to more transparency on partner earnings
Firm revises pay gap figures to include partners with numbers highlighting dearth of female partners at senior levels
March 26, 2018 at 08:16 AM
3 minute read
Pinsent Masons has restated its gender pay gap figures to include partner data and called on fellow law firms to work together to develop a common approach to pay disclosures next year, in a bid to address the lack of gender parity in the profession.
The firm has gone beyond its previous statutory filing – which revealed a 22% mean hourly pay gap across all staff and a 47% bonus gap – to highlight the impact that the lack of women at partner level makes on the figures.
Pinsents has revealed that within its partnership, while there is a 22% pay gap in favour of men, female partners receive on average 11% more in bonuses.
However, as just 25% of the firm's partners are female, when combining partners with the firm's salaried staff, the mean gender pay gap rises to 58%, with men paid on average 52% more in bonuses.
Senior partner Richard Foley said the firm had decided to go beyond the statutory reporting requirement in the interests of transparency, and that it was planning to engage with both the Law Society and other City law firms to try to change the reporting requirements for next year.
Foley said: "Since publishing our numbers we have become increasingly concerned by a perception that, in following regulations designed to promote transparency, partnerships have somehow avoided their responsibilities. Today we are publishing numbers which go beyond what is stipulated in government guidelines."
To date, just a handful of other major law firms have opted to disclose details of partner pay, including Reed Smith, Norton Rose Fulbright and Irwin Mitchell, although the big four accounting firms have all restated their figures to include partner earnings following criticism such as Conservative MP Nicky Morgan's comments that firms are "taking advantage of a loophole" and "abiding by the letter of the law, but not the spirit".
"What has become clear in recent weeks is that public expectations go beyond what the regulations require, and that the regulations as currently drafted provide too much scope for an inconsistent approach to reporting by partnerships," added Foley. "We hope that this voluntary disclosure will aid transparency; however to ensure that this is meaningful, we will be engaging with the Law Society and other City law firms to seek their support in making representations to government to make changes.
"It cannot be right that partnerships have no common methodology and thus have to pick and choose what to report. Only by achieving consistency can we create a level playing field and secure the transparency expected of us by our people, our clients and the wider public."
All UK organisations employing more than 250 people must disclose their gender pay gap report by 4 April, and to date, more than half of the UK's 50 largest law firms have announced their figures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 3Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 4Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 5Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250