DWF in line for over £1.3m from Kensington and Chelsea Council for advice on Grenfell fire disaster
Council pays out bulk of legal fees to DWF with a small portion going to Wilkin Chapman and Weightmans
April 04, 2018 at 06:36 AM
3 minute read
DWF is set to be paid more than £1.3m by Kensington and Chelsea Council for advice given in relation to the Grenfell Tower disaster, which resulted in the deaths of 71 people in June last year.
The council's legal spend is detailed in a report, approved in a council meeting last night (3 April), by the borough's director of law Tasnim Shawkat.
The report breaks down the spending on DWF, as at 19 February, as £737,104 to the firm's regulatory team, £200,431 to its insurance litigation team, and £418,839 to a DWF public inquiry team.
The figures include fees for work in progress.
The report also reveals that Weightmans has also been instructed by the council, owing to "the complexity of the issues arising from the fire and its aftermath". As of 22 February 2018, the fees spent on Weightmans were £11,858.
The council had also instructed northeast law firm Wilkin Chapman, with Shawkat's report detailing that the firm has earned £13,000 in fees from the council. Wilkin Chapman regulatory partner Jonathan Goolden stated that the firm provided governance support and advice to the Royal Borough's monitoring officer in relation to a full council meeting.
The report also proposes a legal budget of £3.5m for issues relating to the Grenfell Tower disaster for the 2018-19 financial year.
In September, Legal Week revealed that DWF and Wilkin Chapman were advising the council in relation to the fire, with DWF's head of regulatory Steffan Groch leading the firm's team.
In 2012, Groch led a DWF team that advised Lion Steel Equipment on its £480,000 fine for the corporate manslaughter of an employee who died following a workplace accident. The case was only the third time a company in the UK was convicted under the 2008 Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act.
Separately, an inquiry into the Grenfell disaster is being led by the former Court of Appeal judge Sir Martin Moore-Bick, alongside barristers Richard Millett QC of Essex Court Chambers, Lamb Building's Bernard Richmond QC, Kate Grange QC of 39 Essex Chambers, and solicitor to the inquiry Caroline Featherstone.
A DWF spokesperson said: "We cannot comment on the fee arrangements or nature of the work being carried out by DWF for Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council, due to client confidentiality."
Kensington and Chelsea Council, Weightmans and Wilkin Chapman were contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Hires Trio for Luxembourg Launch, Builds Private Capital Practice
To Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250