Rosenblatt aims to raise £43m in fourth UK law firm listing
City firm aims for largest UK law IPO to date as filing sets out £76m market capitalisation
May 03, 2018 at 07:25 AM
2 minute read
City law firm Rosenblatt is hoping to raise £43m from its initial public offering (IPO), according to a new filing ahead of its AIM listing next week (8 May).
According to the stock exchange filing, the firm expects to raise the money based on the placing of 36,842,106 new ordinary shares and 8,421,053 existing ordinary shares at an issue price of 95p per share, giving the firm an anticipated market capitalisation of approximately £76m.
The target of £43m would make it the largest UK law firm IPO to date, following Gateley's first move in 2015, which raised £30m. The other two IPOs, Gordon Dadds and Keystone, raised £20m and £15m respectively when they listed on AIM last year.
The filing also reveals that firm founder and senior partner Ian Rosenblatt will see his shares in the company more than halve from 59% to 21.1% after the listing. The other current significant shareholder, Cascades – an independent trust company – will retain a 14.4% holding in the company, down from 26.4%.
New shareholders include Milton Asset Management (15.8%), Fidelity Investments (6.6%), Blackrock (6%) and Canaccord Genuity Group (3.6%).
Rosenblatt, which focuses on litigation and contentious restructuring work, is a single-office London practice led by Rosenblatt, who founded the firm in 1989. According to its website, it has 19 partners. It is being advised by broker Cenkos Securities on the listing.
Recent high-profile work for Rosenblatt has included advising Northern & Shell on the £127m sale of its newspaper business to Trinity Mirror. The firm's relationship with Northern & Shell's owner, Richard Desmond, dates back to 1983, and in 2010 the firm also advised on the newspaper proprietor on his €125m purchase of Channel Five.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Can Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute read
Cracking Canada: How International Law Firms Penetrate the Country's Legal Market
6 minute read
Hong Kong IPO Market Shows Signs of Slow but Steady Recovery
Mexico's Judicial Reforms and the Implications for Foreign Investors
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
