Pinsent Masons advises BBC on settlement with Appleby over 'Paradise Papers' leaks
Firm acting opposite Osborne Clarke as parties resolve differences over leak of confidential documents
May 04, 2018 at 06:18 AM
4 minute read
Pinsent Masons is advising the BBC as the broadcaster and The Guardian newspaper reach a settlement with offshore law firm Appleby over the 'Paradise Papers' data hack.
The litigation, which was settled on Friday afternoon (4 May), comes after Appleby took legal action against both news outlets, citing breach of confidence following the data hack in May 2016.
In an agreed statement, the parties announced they had "resolved their differences".
The statement continues: "Without compromising their journalistic integrity or ability to continue to do public interest journalism, The Guardian and the BBC have assisted Appleby by explaining which of the company's documents may have been used to underpin their journalism. This will allow Appleby to initiate meaningful discussions with its clients, colleagues and regulators."
The offshore firm had alleged that information leaked to German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) and subsequently passed onto The Guardian and BBC was "obtained unlawfully" in circumstances "likely to have amounted to the commission of a criminal offence or cyber-hack".
Appleby said the leak coverered 6.8 million documents dating back to the 1950s, including loan agreements, financial statements, records of approaches from potential clients and records of legal advice, among other information.
The particulars of claim alleged that The Guardian and BBC should have known the information they had access to was confidential and subject to legal privilege, and that the publication of the documents did not meet the public interest test as "there was no ground to suspect that the confidential information disclosed illegal conduct" either by Appleby or its clients.
The offshore firm was seeking the delivery, destruction or deletion of the information, as well as financial damages covering the costs of dealing with "regulatory entities, clients, employees and agents".
In their defence, both the BBC and The Guardian argued that there was a strong public interest in the publication of the information from the leak, while the BBC's defence states that there were grounds for suspecting that the data contained evidence of unlawful activity by Appleby or its clients.
Both the BBC and The Guardian stated that they were unaware of the source that passed the leaked documents to SZ, and argued that they acquired the information lawfully.
A BBC spokesperson said: "We will continue to defend our journalism robustly."
Pinsents technology, media and telecoms disputes partner David Barker acted for the BBC, with Catrin Evans QC of Matrix Chambers and Jonathan Scherbel-Ball of One Brick Court instructed as counsel.
In December, Legal Week revealed that Appleby had turned to Osborne Clarke for advice on the dispute, with litigation partner Ashley Hurst acting for the firm. He is joined by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Lorna Skinner of Matrix Chambers.
The Guardian was represented by its in-house director of editorial legal services Gillian Phillips, with Gavin Millar QC of Matrix Chambers and David Glen of One Brick Court as counsel.
Appleby is one of the world's best-known offshore law firms, with offices in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Seychelles and Shanghai. Its clients include Uber, Apple and Nike, as well as accounting giants KPMG, EY and PwC.
The firm said it had "thoroughly and vigorously" investigated the allegations prompted by the leak and that it was "satisfied that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing, either on the part of ourselves or our clients".
The Paradise Papers revelations came on the back of the earlier 'Panama Papers' leak from offshore firm Mossack Fonseca, which this March announced that it was closing down.
The Panama-based firm said it had suffered "irreparable damage" due to "the reputational deterioration, the media campaign, the financial siege and the irregular actions of some Panamanian authorities" in response to the leaks.
The Guardian declined to comment. Pinsent Masons was contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250