Pinsent Masons advises BBC on settlement with Appleby over 'Paradise Papers' leaks
Firm acting opposite Osborne Clarke as parties resolve differences over leak of confidential documents
May 04, 2018 at 06:18 AM
4 minute read
Pinsent Masons is advising the BBC as the broadcaster and The Guardian newspaper reach a settlement with offshore law firm Appleby over the 'Paradise Papers' data hack.
The litigation, which was settled on Friday afternoon (4 May), comes after Appleby took legal action against both news outlets, citing breach of confidence following the data hack in May 2016.
In an agreed statement, the parties announced they had "resolved their differences".
The statement continues: "Without compromising their journalistic integrity or ability to continue to do public interest journalism, The Guardian and the BBC have assisted Appleby by explaining which of the company's documents may have been used to underpin their journalism. This will allow Appleby to initiate meaningful discussions with its clients, colleagues and regulators."
The offshore firm had alleged that information leaked to German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) and subsequently passed onto The Guardian and BBC was "obtained unlawfully" in circumstances "likely to have amounted to the commission of a criminal offence or cyber-hack".
Appleby said the leak coverered 6.8 million documents dating back to the 1950s, including loan agreements, financial statements, records of approaches from potential clients and records of legal advice, among other information.
The particulars of claim alleged that The Guardian and BBC should have known the information they had access to was confidential and subject to legal privilege, and that the publication of the documents did not meet the public interest test as "there was no ground to suspect that the confidential information disclosed illegal conduct" either by Appleby or its clients.
The offshore firm was seeking the delivery, destruction or deletion of the information, as well as financial damages covering the costs of dealing with "regulatory entities, clients, employees and agents".
In their defence, both the BBC and The Guardian argued that there was a strong public interest in the publication of the information from the leak, while the BBC's defence states that there were grounds for suspecting that the data contained evidence of unlawful activity by Appleby or its clients.
Both the BBC and The Guardian stated that they were unaware of the source that passed the leaked documents to SZ, and argued that they acquired the information lawfully.
A BBC spokesperson said: "We will continue to defend our journalism robustly."
Pinsents technology, media and telecoms disputes partner David Barker acted for the BBC, with Catrin Evans QC of Matrix Chambers and Jonathan Scherbel-Ball of One Brick Court instructed as counsel.
In December, Legal Week revealed that Appleby had turned to Osborne Clarke for advice on the dispute, with litigation partner Ashley Hurst acting for the firm. He is joined by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Lorna Skinner of Matrix Chambers.
The Guardian was represented by its in-house director of editorial legal services Gillian Phillips, with Gavin Millar QC of Matrix Chambers and David Glen of One Brick Court as counsel.
Appleby is one of the world's best-known offshore law firms, with offices in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Seychelles and Shanghai. Its clients include Uber, Apple and Nike, as well as accounting giants KPMG, EY and PwC.
The firm said it had "thoroughly and vigorously" investigated the allegations prompted by the leak and that it was "satisfied that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing, either on the part of ourselves or our clients".
The Paradise Papers revelations came on the back of the earlier 'Panama Papers' leak from offshore firm Mossack Fonseca, which this March announced that it was closing down.
The Panama-based firm said it had suffered "irreparable damage" due to "the reputational deterioration, the media campaign, the financial siege and the irregular actions of some Panamanian authorities" in response to the leaks.
The Guardian declined to comment. Pinsent Masons was contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250