Slaughter and May advising Fulham owner Khan on £1bn Wembley bid
Magic circle heavyweight Boardman called up for headline-making takeover offer
May 11, 2018 at 12:34 PM
2 minute read
Slaughter and May is advising US businessman Shahid Khan on his offer, reportedly worth about £1bn, to buy Wembley Stadium from the Football Association (FA).
Khan, who owns Fulham Football Club and US National Football League franchise Jacksonville Jaguars, made the bid for the iconic venue in April.
The Slaughters team advising Khan includes M&A heavyweight Nigel Boardman and real estate partner Jane Edwarde.
Last month (28 April), Khan told Sky Sports that the deal is worth £1bn, when combining his £600m offer for the stadium with the estimated £400m value of the Club Wembley hospitality business and the rights to the games played there, which the FA is expected to retain.
In 2013, Khan turned to Squire Patton Boggs – then known as Squire Sanders – on his £200m takeover of Fulham FC. Corporate and sports law partner David Hull led the Squires team on that deal.
The FA's legal function is led by legal and governance director Polly Handford, who joined in 2014 from sports boutique Couchmans. It is not yet clear whether the FA will instruct external counsel to advise on Khan's offer.
Firms that have advised the FA in the past include Charles Russell Speechlys, Bird & Bird, Pinsent Masons, Mayer Brown and Allen & Overy, all of which were appointed to its corporate support panel in 2010, while Berwin Leighton Paisner – now Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner – advised the association on the development of its £105m St George's Park national football centre, which opened in 2012.
Other major deals Slaughters is currently working on include the proposed merger of supermarket giants Asda and Sainsbury's. Boardman and Edwarde are part of the firm's team advising Asda's owner, US retail giant Walmart.
Edwarde is also leading a Slaughters team advising Everton Football Club on its plans to build a new £300m stadium at Bramley Moore Dock on the River Mersey.
Photo: Jbmg40
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Jones Day and Wachtell Lead on Anglo American's $3.8B Coal Business Sale
2 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readThe Law Firms Generating 8-Figure Fees on the Year's Big Ticket UK Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 2Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 3A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 4Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 55th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250