Magic circle firms among array of advisers accused of 'squeezing income' from Carillion
Carillion inquiry report says firms were used as 'badge of credibility' as company unravelled
May 16, 2018 at 12:00 AM
4 minute read
The parliamentary inquiry into the collapse of Carillion has accused law firms including Slaughter and May, Clifford Chance (CC) and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer of "squeezing fee income" from the company as it collapsed amid "recklessness, hubris and greed".
The final report into the construction company's high-profile demise – produced by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Work and Pensions select committees – describes Carillion's business model as an "unsustainable dash to cash", adding that the "mystery is not that it collapsed, but how it kept going for so long".
The report, released today (16 May) details how Carillion's directors were supported by an "array of illustrious advisory firms" which, as it unravelled, were "squeezing fee income out of what remained of the company".
It goes on to allege that the advisers were used as a "badge of credibility" that only served to prove the willingness of the company's board to "throw money at a problem" and of the firms to "accept generous fees".
Slaughters, CC and Freshfields are listed in the report alongside Mills & Reeve, Sacker & Partners, Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld as having received fees from Carillion in the days before it was declared insolvent. Almost £2m was paid to those law firms on 12 January, with Slaughters receiving the lion's share with £1.2m, followed by Akin Gump (£305,500) and Willkie Farr (£164,000).
The report argues that such advisory firms are "not incentivised to act as a check on recklessly-run businesses", and that "a long and lucrative relationship is not secured by rocking the boat".
Former Carillion chairman Philip Green – who told the inquiry that the board believed they took "high-quality advice" – is described as "delusional" in his upbeat assessment of the company's situation as it was in decline, while CFO Richard Adam is dubbed the "architect of Carillion's aggressive accounting policies". Company secretary and director of legal services Richard Tapp is not referenced in the report.
The report is also critical of the role played by big four accountancy firms KPMG, EY and PwC. KPMG is described as "complicit" in the company's accounting, due to its 19 year-role as auditor to the company, for which it was paid £29m. EY was paid £10.8m for "six months of failed turnaround advice", while Deloitte is said to have earned £10m for its position as internal auditor, charging an average of £775,000 a year since 2010.
The report warns of a "crisis of confidence" within the auditing profession, adding that the failures around Carillion are symptomatic of a market that "works for the Big Four firms but fails the wider economy".
"Waiting for a more competitive market that promotes quality and trust in audits has failed," the report states. "It is time for a radically different approach. The Government refers the statutory audit market to the Competition and Markets Authority. The terms of reference of that review should explicitly include consideration of both breaking up the Big Four into more audit firms, and detaching audit arms from those providing other professional services."
A host of law firms took up roles relating to Carillion's collapse, with Freshfields and Dentons advising the official receiver and Slaughters advising the company itself. CC and Linklaters advised a number of Carillion's lenders, while Mayer Brown acted for the Pension Protection Fund and Akin Gump and Willkie Farr took roles for private placement holders and convertible bond holders respectively.
Freshfields declined to comment. Slaughters and CC were contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250