Linklaters criticised by MPs for refusing to discuss role on £1bn Russian energy IPO
Inquiry into Russia influence questions whether magic circle firm's work has left it "entwined in Kremlin corruption"
May 21, 2018 at 07:44 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters has been criticised by the Foreign Affairs Select Committee investigating Russian financial interests in the UK, for refusing to discuss its role on the London listing of Russian energy company En+ Group.
The magic circle firm advised the banks on the initial public offering (IPO) of En+, which was formerly controlled by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, last November, which raised about £1bn.
The listing was backed by Russian investment bank VTB Capital and state-owned Russian bank Gazprombank, both of which have been subject to US sanctions since 2014. This April, Deripaska himself was also placed on a list of sanctioned individuals by the US, and he has since ceded control of En+.
In the wake of the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal on UK soil earlier this year, a parliamentary committee led by Tom Tugendhat MP was set up to investigate Russian influence in the UK, and today (21 May) the committee published its final report – Moscow's Gold: Russian Corruption in the UK.
As part of the inquiry, Linklaters was asked to appear before the committee "to explain their involvement in the flotation of En+ and to give their assessment of the regulatory framework that enabled the flotation to take place", but refused, according to the report.
The report states: "We regret their unwillingness to engage with our inquiry and must leave others to judge whether their work at 'the forefront of financial, corporate and commercial developments in Russia' has left them so entwined in the corruption of the Kremlin and its supporters that they are no longer able to meet the standards expected of a UK-regulated law firm."
The report argues that the En+ float should have "attracted the attention" of UK regulators and describes it as an example of the "inconsistency" in the UK's approach to the Russian regime.
A spokesperson for Linklaters said: "We are very surprised and concerned at the passing criticism of Linklaters in the report. We reject any suggestion based solely on the fact that we – like dozens of other international firms – operate in a particular market, that our services may somehow involve the firm in corruption, state-related or otherwise.
"As a leading global law firm, Linklaters adheres to the highest standards of business conduct, ensuring we comply with applicable laws and professional rules, including with respect to anti-bribery and corruption, anti-money laundering and sanctions."
As well as his interests in En+, Deripaska is also a director of Russian aluminum company Rusal, with the inquiry report stating that "his proximity to the Kremlin" is "well known". En+, which has a controlling interest in Rusal, announced last week that Deripaska was resigning as a director of the company and would also not seek re-election as a director of Rusal.
In April, partners told Legal Week they were sceptical of claims by Conservative MP and Foreign Affairs Select Committee chair Tugendhat that lawyers should consider the "moral decisions" they take when they engage with Russian clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGermany’s Wirecard Case Moves to Airport Hangar to Accommodate 100 Lawyers
5 minute readCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readGreenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250