Linklaters criticised by MPs for refusing to discuss role on £1bn Russian energy IPO
Inquiry into Russia influence questions whether magic circle firm's work has left it "entwined in Kremlin corruption"
May 21, 2018 at 07:44 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters has been criticised by the Foreign Affairs Select Committee investigating Russian financial interests in the UK, for refusing to discuss its role on the London listing of Russian energy company En+ Group.
The magic circle firm advised the banks on the initial public offering (IPO) of En+, which was formerly controlled by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, last November, which raised about £1bn.
The listing was backed by Russian investment bank VTB Capital and state-owned Russian bank Gazprombank, both of which have been subject to US sanctions since 2014. This April, Deripaska himself was also placed on a list of sanctioned individuals by the US, and he has since ceded control of En+.
In the wake of the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal on UK soil earlier this year, a parliamentary committee led by Tom Tugendhat MP was set up to investigate Russian influence in the UK, and today (21 May) the committee published its final report – Moscow's Gold: Russian Corruption in the UK.
As part of the inquiry, Linklaters was asked to appear before the committee "to explain their involvement in the flotation of En+ and to give their assessment of the regulatory framework that enabled the flotation to take place", but refused, according to the report.
The report states: "We regret their unwillingness to engage with our inquiry and must leave others to judge whether their work at 'the forefront of financial, corporate and commercial developments in Russia' has left them so entwined in the corruption of the Kremlin and its supporters that they are no longer able to meet the standards expected of a UK-regulated law firm."
The report argues that the En+ float should have "attracted the attention" of UK regulators and describes it as an example of the "inconsistency" in the UK's approach to the Russian regime.
A spokesperson for Linklaters said: "We are very surprised and concerned at the passing criticism of Linklaters in the report. We reject any suggestion based solely on the fact that we – like dozens of other international firms – operate in a particular market, that our services may somehow involve the firm in corruption, state-related or otherwise.
"As a leading global law firm, Linklaters adheres to the highest standards of business conduct, ensuring we comply with applicable laws and professional rules, including with respect to anti-bribery and corruption, anti-money laundering and sanctions."
As well as his interests in En+, Deripaska is also a director of Russian aluminum company Rusal, with the inquiry report stating that "his proximity to the Kremlin" is "well known". En+, which has a controlling interest in Rusal, announced last week that Deripaska was resigning as a director of the company and would also not seek re-election as a director of Rusal.
In April, partners told Legal Week they were sceptical of claims by Conservative MP and Foreign Affairs Select Committee chair Tugendhat that lawyers should consider the "moral decisions" they take when they engage with Russian clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readKirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readVenezuela Faces Creditor Class Action Suit After Missing $1.5B Bond Payments
2 minute readTop German Banking Partners Seiler & Rath Rejoin Latham After White & Case Stint
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Settlements Totaled $40B+ Three Years in a Row: 'We’re in a New Era'
- 2Automaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
- 3MLB's Texas Rangers Search For a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
- 4Does the Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
- 5Gen AI Legal Tech Startup Eve Raises $47 Million Series A Investment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250