Eversheds Sutherland scraps annual appraisals and introduces reverse mentoring in performance management shift
Eversheds joins rank of firms moving away from annual appraisals towards more regular feedback.
May 24, 2018 at 09:20 AM
3 minute read
Eversheds Sutherland has scrapped 'formulaic' annual appraisals for all staff, as the firm becomes the latest to rethink its approach to performance management.
The overhaul, which applies to all offices outside the US, has seen the firm introduce quarterly feedback sessions for all fee-earners and staff, with Eversheds encouraging managers to discuss performance issues with their teams on a more regular basis.
Partners and other managers are being trained in the new approach, with management gauging opinion on the shift via two staff surveys so far.
Eversheds Sutherland co-CEO Lee Ranson told Legal Week: "We've had very positive responses to the new system – the historical annual appraisal process was formulaic and involved a lot of paperwork. The process is more dynamic now and keeps people more engaged.
"When we were looking at developing it, I thought back to what I had found helpful when I was a junior associate. It was partners who spent regular time with me and helped me to identify and develop what I was good at that made the most difference.
"We expect people to come out of meetings and have time to talk to their colleagues about their performance. We were very keen to implement something that improved the individual's development as well as the performance of the business as a whole."
Earlier this year Eversheds introduced reverse mentoring for its executive committee, with a view to expanding this to other partners in the future.
Last week, Eversheds posted double-digit increases in both revenue and profit per equity partner (PEP) for its legacy UK business during the 2017-18 financial year.
The firm boosted PEP by 12% from £726,000 to a record high of £812,000, while it took in revenues of £494.6m during the last financial year, up 13%.
Ranson told Legal Week: "We are very pleased with the results, which largely speak for themselves – our performance was strong across the whole international business. Our corporate and real estate practices had a particularly impressive year.
"It has proven our growth strategy is working – based on a conscious effort to spend more time with our clients to best service their needs. Our subsequent lateral hiring strategy and office launches are in direct response to what we heard from them."
The firm is one of a number currently shaking up their appraisal systems, as more and more firms move away from the traditional annual structure for performance reviews. Hogan Lovells recently announced that it is scrapping annual feedback for associates in favour of a new programme that directs associates to proactively seek input from partners and other colleagues about their performance throughout the year.
Meanwhile, Allen & Overy is set to move all of its staff to a new performance management scheme next year, while at the start of 2018 Slaughter and May overhauled its appraisal system for associates, with performance scores dropped in favour of more ongoing feedback and mentoring by dedicated 'continuity' partners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readHow Many Legal Jobs Will be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250