Reed Smith revamps associate life with new billing requirements and app-based feedback
Firm describes the measures as investments in the next generation of leadership that are intended to 'make a big place smaller'
May 30, 2018 at 12:22 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Reed Smith has become the latest firm to direct its attention to the evolving expectations of its younger lawyers, rolling out a new suite of initiatives for associates that includes an app-based feedback process, opportunities to temporarily work in different offices around the globe and a 'ramp-up' programme for lawyers returning from leave.
According to the firm's global head of legal personnel, Casey Ryan, the overhaul wasn't motivated by a specific focus on millennials, but rather "an acknowledgment that there are some creative and inventive ways to do things differently".
She added that the firm wanted to "take a fresh look to make sure that we're doing everything we can to have associates be engaged and progress".
Many of the new ideas came directly from associates, such as the app that will supplement annual reviews and allow for continuous feedback from every lawyer with whom an associate works.
"Associates were asking for more than one piece of feedback a year," Ryan said.
Through the app, associates can request detailed feedback from their supervisors and routinely schedule check-in meetings. The firm considered entirely abandoning the annual review system, as Hogan Lovells did, but opted against that.
"The value of having a once-a-year formal sit-down seemed too great to let go of, but it needed to be augmented by continual feedback across the year," Ryan said, calling the firm's new approach the "best of both worlds".
Another associate-driven change, which was initially rolled out in a pilot project, allows associates to spend one or two weeks, or potentially more, at any of the firm's 28 offices around the world.
Ryan said the firm has funded 20 such "inter-office secondments" for the next year, and associates need to simply fill out a one-page application online. Associates, for example, can travel from Hong Kong to Pittsburgh or London to Washington DC, for the purpose of meeting clients in person or gaining exposure to different elements of the firm's work.
Reed Smith has also revamped its billable hours credit programme, increasing the ceiling from 120 hours to 140 hours and adding new categories to the existing allowance for pro bono work. Now, associates can earn up to 50 hours for substantive professional development activities such as shadowing a deposition or attending court proceedings, and can get another 50 hours for innovation work.
The firm has already previewed its ramp-up programme, reducing hours requirements for attorneys returning from leave. According to Ryan, the initiative is "reason-agnostic", applying equally to disability leave, maternity and paternity leave, and other absences.
"It's just more realistic," she said. "It eases some of the stress when people come back from work."
It is also launching a "reverse mentoring programme" – devised by its head of diversity and inclusion in a brainstorming session with associates – that matches diverse associates with senior firm leaders, with associates serving as the mentors and the senior leaders as the proteges.
"I'm one of the participants. It's great," said Ryan. "It does give you a different perspective. I think it's mutually beneficial, but probably even more beneficial to the senior attorney than the junior attorney."
For Ryan, the new initiatives fit together with other recent measures, such as a firmwide wellness programme aimed at stress reduction and promoting work-life balance, and specific efforts on behalf of working mothers.
"These are all things that make a big place smaller," she said. "They're great for morale, and great investments in the next generation of leadership of the firm."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250