BCLP partners to be rewarded for cross-selling in shift to US-style merit-based pay
Boost cross-selling efforts for better remuneration, BCLP partners told
May 31, 2018 at 10:59 AM
3 minute read
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) has told its partners that individual cross-selling efforts will influence their pay, following the merged firm's shift to a US-style merit-based pay structure.
Partners attending the combined firm's first-ever partner conference in Florida earlier this month were told that BCLP's remuneration committee would take into account individual partner's contributions to cross-selling efforts when calculating their earnings.
The ramped-up expectations around referrals are part of the firm's drive to boost integration between the UK and US arms of the business.
One partner who attended the conference said: "Both parties have realised they have great clients, but management spent a lot of time talking about how we are being remunerated like we are to encourage collaboration and cross-selling.
"It was really drummed in that, being one firm, we have a huge market advantage and that hunting in packs is going to be key," they added.
As part of the union, legacy Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) partners dropped the UK firm's modified lockstep, shifting towards a system that sees all BCLP partners paid on a hybrid merit-based structure more closely aligned with legacy Bryan Cave's structure.
Under the new structure, BCLP partners are told their projected earnings at the beginning of the financial year, with drawings then paid out during the following 12-month period.
Since the merger went live in April, about 220 new business opportunities have been created through the sharing of clients and work between both sides of the firm. These range from direct referrals to opportunities to pitch to existing clients.
Another BCLP partner added: "Partners are very personal with clients at both firms, so improving the cross-selling element was talked about a lot. There was huge emphasis on not just reverting back to being two separate firms and how the focus on being one firm during the merger talks was all part of that."
As part of the transition to the new payment system, legacy BLP partners will be paid using BLP's lockstep system for the eight-month period running from 1 May 2017 to 31 December last year. Profit share will be paid out during the course of this year, in addition to projected drawings for the merged firm, meaning they effectively receive pay for two separate financial years at once.
Speaking to Legal Week in April, BCLP co-chair Lisa Mayhew said: "We genuinely believe that the service you get as a client is more seamless, efficient and valuable if you institutionalise that 'we are one team, one firm, one culture, one profit pool' mantra. If you have that structure, you blow out the barriers of providing services to a client."
A BCLP spokesperson said: "The spirit and output of the conference was consistent with our goal to become the most integrated and connected global law firm in the best interests of clients."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFidal Launches Disputes Practice; Pinsent’s Paris Arbitration Partner Jumps to Boutique Firm, Plus Other French Moves
5 minute readTop Labor Lawyer and Former Germany Managing Partner Leaves A&O Shearman to Found Boutique Firm
3 minute readNoerr’s Former Polish Office Merges With Big Professional Services Firm Eying German-Speaking Clients
3 minute readUS-Based Smith, Gambrell & Russell Expands to Italy With Cross-Border Transactional Attorneys
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250