1,000 lawyers surveyed: more than 80% say demands of path to partnership may not be worth it
Major survey of private practice and in-house lawyers finds frustration with conventional career path
June 05, 2018 at 05:28 AM
3 minute read
More than 80% of lawyers think new entrants to the profession will feel the slog to reach partnership is not worth their while, according to a major new survey.
The research, carried out by Allen & Overy's flexi-working service Peerpoint, gathered views from more than 1,000 lawyers and law students on how attitudes around career aspirations are changing.
Eighty-one percent of respondents – which included both private practice and in-house lawyers – were of the belief that young lawyers entering the profession will feel that undertaking the path to partnership is not worth it, while one in four (24%) said they have, at some point, considered quitting the profession altogether.
This overall disillusionment, the report suggests, owes to a model that has failed to provide lawyers with a sufficient range of career options, leading to a frustration with conventional opportunities.
Even among those who still want to become partner, just 21% feel they will make it – with too much competition and too few clients to go around cited as the main deterrents.
Although partnership remains an ambition for many, attitudes are changing, and an increasing number are turning to less conventional means for job satisfaction, with 20% of respondents saying they want to see the profession move away from the partnership model.
Peerpoint CEO Richard Punt said: "Private practice has taken a very different shape to what it was some years ago, and people's aspirations are changing. Partnership, while nice, is no longer the consuming objective.
"Firms are selling the profession on a historic track record. But they have yet to work out how to pitch the future."
Peerpoint's report argues that much of this growing discontentment flows from an appetite among lawyers for more control over the quality and type of work they undertake, with an increasing number now viewing flexible working options such as consulting as a viable alternative.
More than half of the respondents to the survey (57%) said they would encourage colleagues to pursue a more flexible career as a legal consultant, while 38% have themselves considered it.
Punt suggested this can be attributed to a desire among many lawyers to reclaim control where it has otherwise been lacking. The seachange, he believes, owes less to the dearth of partnership opportunities than to lawyers discovering different ways to "meet their career objectives", with flexible working having now "entered the mainstream".
He said: "As people become more concerned about the way they develop, they look for greater control. And [in this regard] the consulting model is attractive, particularly to millennials."
When asked to pick the top four skills or attributes that lawyers of the future will need, the most popular response was greater technological skills, followed by a strong personal brand and network, and non-legal expertise.
On the point of whether consulting was a realistic option for newly-qualified lawyers, Punt said that, where firms are looking to streamline and become more cost-efficient, "less experienced lawyers are increasingly in demand", with the flexi-working model allowing lawyers to develop their careers, work "right at the cutting edge of tech" and "continue to reinvent themselves".
- Flexible working and new ideas in law will be on the agenda at the LegalWeek CONNECT conference this November – click here for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250