Dentons fees for Carillion advice revealed as report forecasts £20m legal costs for insolvency
National Audit Office report sheds light on expected fees for advice on high-profile insolvency
June 07, 2018 at 06:04 AM
2 minute read
Dentons took home £100,000 in fees for nine months of advice to the Cabinet Office on the collapse of Carillion, it has emerged, as a new report reveals that law firms are expected to earn a total of £20m for their work on the construction giant's insolvency.
The National Audit Office report, which breaks down the actual and forecasted costs of the collapse, says that for the remainder of the insolvency, legal advisers are expected be paid £20m, with accountants picking up £50m. The report projects the total cost to the Cabinet Office at £148m.
Dentons was contracted on 29 August last year, following discussions between the government and Carillion about the firm's sizeable July profit warning. The firm was appointed by the Cabinet Office to help gather legal intelligence on supplier contracts, an instruction that ran until 29 April this year and for which it was paid £100,000.
The Cabinet Office also appointed PwC on 17 September to advise on contingency planning for Carillion's potential insolvency, at a total cost of £600,000.
A separate Dentons team also acted for the official receiver following Carillion's collapse, including London restructuring partners Nigel Barnett and Neil Griffiths.
Last month, the parliamentary inquiry into the collapse accused magic circle law firms including Slaughter and May, Clifford Chance (CC) and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer of "squeezing fee income" from the company as it collapsed through "recklessness, hubris and greed".
The inquiry's final report – produced by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Work and Pensions select committees – detailed how the company's directors were supported by an "array of illustrious advisory firms" that were used as a "badge of credibility". Slaughters, CC and Freshfields were listed in the report alongside Mills & Reeve, Sacker & Partners, Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
The report alleged that advisory firms are "not incentivised to act as a check on recklessly-run businesses", stating that "a long and lucrative relationship is not secured by rocking the boat".
Separately, a letter released by the firm last month revealed that Slaughters billed Carillion a total of £8.4m for advice in the 18 months prior to its liquidation in January this year.
Dentons was contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250