'A long-term investment' - why international law firms are opening offices in Tokyo again
A string of firms including Mayer Brown, Debevoise and King & Spalding have moved into Japan in recent years on the back of a wave of outbound projects and M&A deals
June 07, 2018 at 12:00 AM
7 minute read
By John Kang
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After a long hiatus, Tokyo is back on the radar of global law firms.
Several international firms have opened offices in Japan in the past few years - most recently Mayer Brown, which launched its office earlier this year. Debevoise & Plimpton's Tokyo office opened last year, and King & Spalding, Withers and offshore firm Harneys all opened Tokyo bases in 2015.
They are coming to Japan, home to some of the world's largest companies and industry leaders, because there is an increasing amount of work. And in a country where personal relationships still carry a lot of weight - even in business - global law firms need to be near their Japanese clients, lawyers say.
The first-ever batch of global firms to enter the Japanese market came during the economic boom of the late 1980s, after the Japanese Government enacted a law in 1987 that for the first time allowed foreign firms and their lawyers to establish offices in Japan. But when the good times soured in the 1990s, those firms sharply cut back or exited the country entirely.
Now, international firms are making a comeback, riding a recent wave of outbound projects and M&A work emanating from Japan. Japanese clients want their law firms near them - they want an on-the-ground presence, both in the country where the work is going and in Japan. And firms have complied.
"In order to capture that work, you really need to be here," said Rupert Burrows, who this year launched Mayer Brown's Tokyo office, which he heads. "A lot of the clients will ask: 'Before we give you a request for proposal, do you have an office in that country?'"
Law firms working with Japanese companies must have global coverage, Burrows said. But the missing piece for many of them has been Tokyo. "[That is where] all the head offices are, and where a lot of the big investment decisions are made," he said, noting that having a base in Japan is all about servicing existing client relationships and expanding the work the firm does for them.
Indeed, Debevoise's Tokyo office, which focuses on corporate matters, opened primarily to be near its biggest Japanese client - trading giant Mitsui & Co. M&A specialist Ezra Borut has been advising Mitsui for a long time - from its joint venture with the Dow Chemical in 2010 to its $435m stake in Penske Truck Leasing last September. Borut relocated from New York and is the sole partner in the Tokyo office.
Borut said he wouldn't be surprised if more firms start to open offices in Tokyo. "Japanese companies are increasingly looking abroad to invest, and being on the ground in Tokyo is an important factor in winning and maintaining their work," he said.
Japanese companies have for years been particularly active in building infrastructure overseas. Energy and infrastructure specialist John McClenahan, who helped launch the King & Spalding Tokyo office, which he now heads, continues to see a flow of outbound projects work. "There's been a move away from the fossil fuels, such as coal, and so when you've got a shift … there are opportunities for people getting into the sector," he said.
In 2015, members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, which includes Japan, agreed to end export credits for inefficient coal plant technology, the most polluting of fossil fuels. The deal took effect at the start of last year.
From the Tokyo base, firms do projects work across the globe, including in Southeast Asia, where Japan has been investing in infrastructure projects since the early 1990s. "Because of its geographic location, there will be a very strong nexus with Southeast Asia and the investments that Japanese clients are making there," said Mayer Brown's Burrows, who also specialises in energy and infrastructure.
While Southeast Asia is a major focus because of the close proximity and time zones, a lot of Japanese investment is going elsewhere, such as the Americas, Europe and the Middle East, Burrows said.
In addition to building and investing in power plants, facilities, mines and rail systems abroad, Japanese companies are looking for acquisitions overseas - encouraged by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's 'Abenomics' - economic policies that support outbound deals by providing low-cost financing.
"Gordon Palmquist, one of my partners, is in mainstream corporate M&A and there's a lot going on there, for example, in the insurance space, food and agriculture, even in health care, and it's on a global basis, which is why the global platform is just so important," Burrows said.
So far this year, Japan has already been involved in deals worth approximately $115.9bn, according to Thomson Reuters. This includes SoftBank-led consortium's $7bn investment in Uber, which closed in January, and Japanese drugmaker Takeda's $62bn bid for London-listed Shire last month.
"The M&A market is certainly promising, both outbound and inbound," said Debevoise's Borut. Japanese companies are seeking to expand into overseas markets against the backdrop of a shrinking domestic economy, government support for outbound investment, as well as governance reforms that have put pressure on Japanese CEOs to improve returns on equity, he said.
But there is inbound M&A work as well, he added. "[This] is being driven in part by Japanese conglomerates seeking to rationalise their business portfolios or otherwise sell assets in distress situations, including to foreign buyers - notably private equity funds," he said.
In 2017, Japan saw $29.5bn worth of inbound M&A from 621 deals - almost triple the amount of the previous year, according to Thomson Reuters data. The biggest deal was the Bain Capital-led consortium's $18bn acquisition of Toshiba's semiconductor business.
With all these deals and projects, global law firms may be tempted to aggressively expand in Tokyo. But with a few exceptions, such as Baker McKenzie and Morrison & Foerster, the Tokyo offices of most firms are relatively small.
Borut warns that it would be wrong for international firms to plow into Japan wholesale. "Japan is a highly competitive legal market, both from a quality and pricing perspective," he said. "Developing new client relationships in Japan takes considerable time, so firms need to be prepared to make a long-term investment."
While Borut, who has been advising Mitsui for years, relocated to Debevoise's Tokyo office, other firms, such as Mayer Brown and King & Spalding, recruited established teams already well-known in the market.
Both Mayer Brown and King & Spalding poached lawyers from Ashurst's Tokyo office, including the then-Tokyo heads - Burrows and McClenahan, respectively. Mayer Brown also hired former Ashurst banking counsel Shri Maski and former Shearman & Sterling corporate associate Gordon Palmquist as partners. And this week, it expanded its Japan practice with two respected former Morgan Lewis & Bockius partners, Satoru Murase and Yoshihide Ito, in its US offices. Both are well-known by Japanese companies for their expertise in doing business in the US.
When McClenahan, who helped launch Ashurst's Tokyo office in 1990, jumped to King & Spalding, he brought with him projects partner Mark Davies and disputes partner Chris Bailey, who worked with him in Ashurst's Tokyo office. "There's a very high entry barrier to get into Japan, so you need to entice a team away from one of the established firms to help you get established in Japan," McClenahan said. "Otherwise, you've got a long lead time ahead of you."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250