Cravath tops Milbank rates to set new high in associate salary race
Elite US firm sets new salary standard with higher rates for mid-level and senior associates and pays out special bonus
June 11, 2018 at 06:38 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
After setting the pace for associate salary increases in 2016, Cravath Swaine & Moore has surpassed the pay scale set last week by Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy.
As first noted on Monday (11 June) by Above the Law, Cravath has matched salaries set by Milbank for its junior associates. But for its mid-level and senior associates, the Wall Street firm has gone $5,000 and $10,000, respectively, beyond the rates set by Milbank.
Cravath's new associate base salaries, effective as of 1 July, are as follows:
- Class of 2017 – $190,000
- Class of 2016 – $200,000
- Class of 2015 – $220,000
- Class of 2014 – $255,000
- Class of 2013 – $280,000
- Class of 2012 – $305,000
- Class of 2011 – $325,000
- Class of 2010 – $340,000
The firm is also doling out special bonuses akin to those announced last week by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. These mid-year bonuses will be paid out on 29 June.
- Class of 2017 – $5,000
- Class of 2016 – $7,500
- Class of 2015 – $10,000
- Class of 2014 – $15,000
- Class of 2013 – $20,000
- Class of 2012 – $25,000
- Class of 2011 – $25,000
- Class of 2010 – $25,000
Milbank first made waves when the firm announced that it would be increasing its associate salaries across the board by $10,000 or $15,000, making the new base salary $190,000 for incoming first-year associates. Since then, Proskauer Rose, Simpson Thacher and Winston & Strawn have been among the Am Law 100 firms to match the Milbank scale, as well as high-profile litigation boutiques such as the newly-formed Selendy & Gay.
But Cravath, whose gross revenue and profits per partner dipped slightly in 2017 as the storied firm's lockstep compensation model came under scrutiny, is now the latest entrant in the seemingly never-ending associate salary race. A source familiar with firm matters confirmed its decision to increase associate salaries and bonuses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250