Interest in law firm IPOs on the rise as new research finds growing approval for external funding
Twenty percent of top 100 law firm financial directors would now consider an IPO, up from just 4% four years ago
June 12, 2018 at 09:21 AM
4 minute read
More law firms than ever are considering listing on the stock market in order to raise funds, according to a new survey of finance directors (FDs) at the UK top 100 law firms.
The research, carried out by Thomson Reuters, found that one fifth of finance directors (FDs) at the UK's 100 largest law firms would now consider an initial public offering (IPO), compared with just 4% in 2013-14.
The research also shows that the percentage of FDs who would consider private equity investment as a source of funding tripled last year to 24%, up from 8% in 2015-16.
Last week, Knights announced that it will become the fifth UK law firm to list on London's AIM market, with a float set for later this month. Gateley was the first to do so in 2015, followed by Gordon Dadds and Keystone in 2017, while Rosenblatt listed earlier this year.
Commenting on the findings, White & Case London-based capital markets partner Jonathan Parry said: "If a firm is thinking of strategic change, investing in new jurisdictions or practice areas, the capital to fund this has to come from somewhere. Partners can either fund out of their own pockets or the firm can take out debt. The recent and well-publicised troubles of a few firms has reinforced a reluctance to rely too heavily on debt. The other obvious option is to access external equity via an IPO."
Firms like us need to watch what is happening with great interest – we can't afford to have competitors at an advantage
Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams agreed but said that generally, law firm access to capital is not a "constraining factor". "They are able to borrow and they are able to borrow more cheaply. Whether you need to float to do it, I remain doubtful," he said.
Fieldfisher managing partner Michael Chissick (pictured), whose firm advised the banks on three of the UK law firm IPOs to date – Gateley, Keystone and Rosenblatt – said these listings are "shaking up the market".
"What is happening in the law firm IPO market is really interesting. All law firm managing partners need to be keeping an eye on this development. The law firms that have listed to date have made a lot of money and have a warchest to play with. We are watching with interest to see if a bigger player comes to the market," he added.
To date, Gateley is the only UK top 50-ranked firm to float, and Samantha Steer, director of large law strategy at Thomson Reuters, said that bigger, international law firms are less likely to list as the partnership model works well for them, because they already have the funding to invest in new technologies and expansion.
Parry added that partners at large firms still enjoy the level of control they have over the running of the business, which could be lost should external investors get involved, while Chissick also has doubts over whether the IPO option will work for international law firms.
"The IPOs so far are all smaller UK firms," he said. "I am not aware of any international ones; local bar rules make it very difficult for firms like ours with integrated offices to list, because the local bar rules prohibit third parties sharing with profits with non-lawyers. A lot of continental Europe bar rules ban non-lawyers sharing profits in the organisation, so as soon as you have an investor or fund manager sharing profits you fall foul.
"If we can solve the European bar issue then yes, we would be interested, but at the moment we can't list as a fully integrated European law firm," Chissick said. "Firms like us will need to watch what is happening with great interest – we can't afford to have competitors at an advantage."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Cleary, Clifford Chance Help Middle East Sovereign Wealth Funds Monetise Assets
3 minute readWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Trending Stories
- 1Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 2Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 3Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 4Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
- 5Judge Grants TRO Blocking Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250