Interest in law firm IPOs on the rise as new research finds growing approval for external funding
Twenty percent of top 100 law firm financial directors would now consider an IPO, up from just 4% four years ago
June 12, 2018 at 09:21 AM
4 minute read
More law firms than ever are considering listing on the stock market in order to raise funds, according to a new survey of finance directors (FDs) at the UK top 100 law firms.
The research, carried out by Thomson Reuters, found that one fifth of finance directors (FDs) at the UK's 100 largest law firms would now consider an initial public offering (IPO), compared with just 4% in 2013-14.
The research also shows that the percentage of FDs who would consider private equity investment as a source of funding tripled last year to 24%, up from 8% in 2015-16.
Last week, Knights announced that it will become the fifth UK law firm to list on London's AIM market, with a float set for later this month. Gateley was the first to do so in 2015, followed by Gordon Dadds and Keystone in 2017, while Rosenblatt listed earlier this year.
Commenting on the findings, White & Case London-based capital markets partner Jonathan Parry said: "If a firm is thinking of strategic change, investing in new jurisdictions or practice areas, the capital to fund this has to come from somewhere. Partners can either fund out of their own pockets or the firm can take out debt. The recent and well-publicised troubles of a few firms has reinforced a reluctance to rely too heavily on debt. The other obvious option is to access external equity via an IPO."
Firms like us need to watch what is happening with great interest – we can't afford to have competitors at an advantage
Jomati Consultants principal Tony Williams agreed but said that generally, law firm access to capital is not a "constraining factor". "They are able to borrow and they are able to borrow more cheaply. Whether you need to float to do it, I remain doubtful," he said.
Fieldfisher managing partner Michael Chissick (pictured), whose firm advised the banks on three of the UK law firm IPOs to date – Gateley, Keystone and Rosenblatt – said these listings are "shaking up the market".
"What is happening in the law firm IPO market is really interesting. All law firm managing partners need to be keeping an eye on this development. The law firms that have listed to date have made a lot of money and have a warchest to play with. We are watching with interest to see if a bigger player comes to the market," he added.
To date, Gateley is the only UK top 50-ranked firm to float, and Samantha Steer, director of large law strategy at Thomson Reuters, said that bigger, international law firms are less likely to list as the partnership model works well for them, because they already have the funding to invest in new technologies and expansion.
Parry added that partners at large firms still enjoy the level of control they have over the running of the business, which could be lost should external investors get involved, while Chissick also has doubts over whether the IPO option will work for international law firms.
"The IPOs so far are all smaller UK firms," he said. "I am not aware of any international ones; local bar rules make it very difficult for firms like ours with integrated offices to list, because the local bar rules prohibit third parties sharing with profits with non-lawyers. A lot of continental Europe bar rules ban non-lawyers sharing profits in the organisation, so as soon as you have an investor or fund manager sharing profits you fall foul.
"If we can solve the European bar issue then yes, we would be interested, but at the moment we can't list as a fully integrated European law firm," Chissick said. "Firms like us will need to watch what is happening with great interest – we can't afford to have competitors at an advantage."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readCracking Canada: How International Law Firms Penetrate the Country's Legal Market
6 minute readHong Kong IPO Market Shows Signs of Slow but Steady Recovery
Mexico's Judicial Reforms and the Implications for Foreign Investors
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250