Mishcon advising Leave.EU on appeal against Brexit fine amid Twitter defamation dispute
Bindmans and Mishcon advising as fallout from Sunday Times claims of Russian Brexit interference prompts legal action
June 12, 2018 at 08:51 AM
2 minute read
Mishcon de Reya is acting for Leave.EU on its appeal against the Electoral Commission's £70,000 fine for offences relating to campaign funding and spending during the referendum campaign.
The commission's fine came after it found the Brexit campaigning group inaccurately filed three loans received during the campaign and failed to include at least £77,380 in its spending return, thereby exceeding its spending limit.
Leave.EU co-founder Arron Banks (pictured above right), who appeared in front of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee's inquiry into 'fake news' this morning (12 June), told the committee that the appeal was filed at 9am today.
In a statement, the organisation said: "Leave.EU is striking back at the scheming Electoral Commission lying at the centre of the anti-Brexit campaign. [...] We look forward to seeing their representatives in Court. Brexit will not be beaten, and neither will Leave.EU."
The news comes as journalism website Byline has instructed London law firm Bindmans to serve Banks and former Leave.EU communications director Andy Wigmore (pictured above left) with a defamation notice, after an online dispute over the source of news revelations in this weekend's Sunday Times about Banks' Russian connections.
Banks has alleged on Twitter that articles published this weekend, which revealed previously undisclosed meetings with the Russian ambassador to the UK, had made their way into the press after journalist Isabel Oakeshott – who had been given the emails to ghostwrite Banks' book about the Brexit campaign – had been hacked by Byline and The Guardian.
On Sunday, Banks tweeted to Guardian and Observer writer Carol Cadwalladr: "The @thetimes have already got your story, you obtained from emails stolen from @IsabelOakeshott."
Banks also tweeted that Oakeshott had told him that his emails "were hacked by Byline/@guardian and that you were using stolen information".
Replying to Banks' tweet, Wigmore replied "theft is equally criminal", tagging Mishcon de Reya's official Twitter account in the tweet. Wigmore also referenced Mishcon in a tweet in which he referred to getting "quite an education" on theft of data and GDPR by "wonderful solicitors @Mishcon_de_Reya".
Bindman's letter to the pair states that their tweets "bear the defamatory meaning" that Byline hacked Oakeshott's email account. Byline has asked for a retraction and damages.
Mishcon was contacted for comment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250