Which law firms spend the most on their staff?
LLP filings provide an insight into staff costs at the UK top 50 - so which firms have the most expensive employees? And who spends the biggest proportion of revenue on their people?
June 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM
4 minute read
Linklaters has emerged as the law firm with the most expensive staff in the UK, according to research from Legal Week in conjunction with accountants Smith & Williamson.
The magic circle firm has the highest staff costs per employee among the UK top 50, based on an analysis of 2016-17 limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts filed at Companies House.
The firm's total staff costs of £705.1m, divided by its total lawyer and support staff headcount of 4,606, equates to an average cost per total employee of £153,100 – putting it narrowly ahead of magic circle peer Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer on £141,400 in second place.
Of the magic circle, Allen & Overy has the lowest staff costs per employee, according to the accounts, standing at £114,200 per employee. Slaughter and May is not included as it is not an LLP and therefore does not file accounts with Companies House.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, Shakespeare Martineau, Irwin Mitchell and Weightmans have emerged as the firms with the lowest lawyer and support staff costs per employee, ranging from £35,700 to £37,000.
Given that all of the data is taken directly from firms' Companies House filings, it is possible that the findings could be influenced by inconsistencies in how firms classify their employees – for example, Linklaters' and Clifford Chance's total employee numbers include some non-equity partner data, while Freshfields includes US partners in its staff costs, including some in the equity.
The full research by Smith & Williamson – which provides an in-depth analysis of law firm LLP accounts, looking at everything from debt levels to profit margins to partner capital – also highlights the firms spending the largest chunk of their revenue on staff salaries and related costs.
Here, Linklaters and Freshfields once again feature within the top 10, but alongside a very different group of firms.
Insurance-focused firms feature prominently among the highest spenders as a proportion of revenue, with BLM (62%), Gateley (59%) and DAC Beachcroft (53%) leading the top 10 alongside DWF and Clyde &Co.
In contrast, some of the firms with the highest staff costs per employee sit within the 10 firms with the lowest percentage of revenue spent on staff costs.
Macfarlanes, for example, has the eighth-highest costs per employee but, alongside CMS and Stephenson Harwood, spends the smallest percentage of its revenue on its staff than anyone other than Fieldfisher, at 32%.
Similarly, Allen & Overy has the fourth-highest costs per employee but spends only 35% of its revenue on staff costs and salaries, putting it within the 10 lowest spenders.
Smith & Williamson head of professional practices Giles Murphy commented: "While the increase in revenue is pleasing to see, the percentage of this revenue that is being spent on staff costs has increased on average by just over 1% to 42.1%. At a time when firms are increasingly investing in technology and systems to improve efficiency, it seems incongruous that a larger proportion of their income is being spent on staff costs."
- This is the first in a series of articles analysing the 2016-17 LLP accounts of the UK top 50, in association with Smith & Williamson. Other subjects under the microscope will include profit, debt and how the magic circle compares to the rest of the market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250