Which law firms spend the most on their staff?
LLP filings provide an insight into staff costs at the UK top 50 - so which firms have the most expensive employees? And who spends the biggest proportion of revenue on their people?
June 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM
4 minute read
Linklaters has emerged as the law firm with the most expensive staff in the UK, according to research from Legal Week in conjunction with accountants Smith & Williamson.
The magic circle firm has the highest staff costs per employee among the UK top 50, based on an analysis of 2016-17 limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts filed at Companies House.
The firm's total staff costs of £705.1m, divided by its total lawyer and support staff headcount of 4,606, equates to an average cost per total employee of £153,100 – putting it narrowly ahead of magic circle peer Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer on £141,400 in second place.
Of the magic circle, Allen & Overy has the lowest staff costs per employee, according to the accounts, standing at £114,200 per employee. Slaughter and May is not included as it is not an LLP and therefore does not file accounts with Companies House.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, Shakespeare Martineau, Irwin Mitchell and Weightmans have emerged as the firms with the lowest lawyer and support staff costs per employee, ranging from £35,700 to £37,000.
Given that all of the data is taken directly from firms' Companies House filings, it is possible that the findings could be influenced by inconsistencies in how firms classify their employees – for example, Linklaters' and Clifford Chance's total employee numbers include some non-equity partner data, while Freshfields includes US partners in its staff costs, including some in the equity.
The full research by Smith & Williamson – which provides an in-depth analysis of law firm LLP accounts, looking at everything from debt levels to profit margins to partner capital – also highlights the firms spending the largest chunk of their revenue on staff salaries and related costs.
Here, Linklaters and Freshfields once again feature within the top 10, but alongside a very different group of firms.
Insurance-focused firms feature prominently among the highest spenders as a proportion of revenue, with BLM (62%), Gateley (59%) and DAC Beachcroft (53%) leading the top 10 alongside DWF and Clyde &Co.
In contrast, some of the firms with the highest staff costs per employee sit within the 10 firms with the lowest percentage of revenue spent on staff costs.
Macfarlanes, for example, has the eighth-highest costs per employee but, alongside CMS and Stephenson Harwood, spends the smallest percentage of its revenue on its staff than anyone other than Fieldfisher, at 32%.
Similarly, Allen & Overy has the fourth-highest costs per employee but spends only 35% of its revenue on staff costs and salaries, putting it within the 10 lowest spenders.
Smith & Williamson head of professional practices Giles Murphy commented: "While the increase in revenue is pleasing to see, the percentage of this revenue that is being spent on staff costs has increased on average by just over 1% to 42.1%. At a time when firms are increasingly investing in technology and systems to improve efficiency, it seems incongruous that a larger proportion of their income is being spent on staff costs."
- This is the first in a series of articles analysing the 2016-17 LLP accounts of the UK top 50, in association with Smith & Williamson. Other subjects under the microscope will include profit, debt and how the magic circle compares to the rest of the market.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250