Omission of partners from pay gap reporting branded 'outrageous' by government committee
Treasury committee inquiry into diversity in financial services accuses firms of attempting to 'thwart the spirit and letter' of gender pay legislation
June 14, 2018 at 12:06 PM
3 minute read
The omission of partners from gender pay gap reporting has been strongly criticised by the Treasury Select Committee inquiry into gender diversity in the financial services industry, with City minister John Glen MP branding the practice as "outrageous".
In its Women in Finance report, published yesterday (12 June), the committee said firms are "circumventing the spirit" of gender pay legislation by not including partners in their reporting, and called on the Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond MP to be "vociferous" on the issue.
Conservative MP John Glen, who earlier this year was appointed Economic Secretary to the Treasury, told the committee that not disclosing the figures was an "outrageous attempt to thwart the spirit and letter of what is required, which is actually to be transparent about a very serious issue that society is very concerned about".
Glen added: "It is sending totally the wrong signal to the next generation who are contemplating apprenticeships and careers."
The inquiry, which was launched in October last year, set out to examine the value to financial firms of having a greater gender balance, identify the barriers to entry for women, and ensure firm cultures, policies and practices support the aspirations of women.
This week's report outlines how government guidelines on gender pay reporting allow firms to omit partners from their reporting as they "take a share of the organisation's profits, which is not directly comparable with employees' pay".
Earlier this week, it was revealed that Allen & Overy (A&O) has declined to provide MPs with its 2016-17 partnership gender pay gap figures, despite the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee requesting the figures from all magic circle firms.
A&O told Legal Week that it will provide the select committee with a gender pay gap figure including partners for the 2017-18 financial year by September. A spokesman said the firm had not yet decided whether it would release the data for the 2016-17 year.
This request followed the appearance of Slaughter and May HR director Louise Meikle in front of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, where she faced questions over the magic circle firm's decision not to include partners in its pay gap reporting.
Meikle told the committee that the firm "would be happy to publish" the data if it was given "clear guidance" on how to do so.
Magic circle rivals Linklaters and Clifford Chance voluntarily included partners in their pay gap reporting, while other law firms to voluntarily do so included Reed Smith, Norton Rose Fulbright, Pinsent Masons, Hogan Lovells and Irwin Mitchell.
Photo credit: Ian Paterson
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250