Weil and Skadden match Cravath as firms aim for moving target on associate pay
Half a dozen US law firms succumb to pressure to raise associate salaries to new heights
June 14, 2018 at 03:57 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Weil Gotshal & Manges has confirmed that it will match the salary scale set by Cravath Swaine & Moore earlier this week for its associates, according to an internal firm memo.
The announcement, along with news that Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Kirkland & Ellis, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom and Willkie Farr & Gallagher are also raising salaries, means at least half a dozen law firms have succumbed to the pressure to raise associate compensation to new heights in just 24 hours.
On Wednesday, as Above the Law first reported, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Sullivan & Cromwell each matched the pay scale and bonuses set by Cravath earlier this week.
Cravath, in turn, had adopted the initial salary increases set by Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy this month for its junior associates, but sweetened pay for its mid-level and senior associates.
RELATED: This Big Law leader decided to match Milbank. Why?
At Weil and the other firms adopting the new-and-improved pay scale, associate base salaries, effective as of 1 July, are as follows:
- Class of 2017 – $190,000
- Class of 2016 – $200,000
- Class of 2015 – $220,000
- Class of 2014 – $255,000
- Class of 2013 – $280,000
- Class of 2012 – $305,000
- Class of 2011 – $325,000
- Class of 2010 – $340,000
New York-based Weil is also implementing special bonuses to its associates, consistent with bonuses announced by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett last week.
"On behalf of all Weil partners, thank you for your continued hard work and dedication," Weil executive partner Barry Wolf said in a memo.
Aiming for the middle?
While these increases might have first-year associates feeling giddy (or jealous), legal experts agree that a key aim of the raises is to recruit and retain mid-level associates.
In the pay scale set by Cravath and matched by all five firms, the biggest jumps in compensation occur in the fourth, fifth and sixth year, noted Dan Binstock, a partner and recruiter at Garrison & Sisson.
"Those tend to be the years in which laterals are most attractive because they have gained the training and experience at another firm and can hit the ground running," said Binstock. "But there's a long runway where firms don't have to worry about making partnership decisions in the immediate future," he added.
Leaps of $35,000 and $25,000 in compensation for mid-level associates show that recruitment and retention are clear priorities, Binstock said.
"This, combined with Weil Gotshal's recent move to reduce the partnership track, has an underlying or more overt signal of this being a real retention play," Binstock said, citing the firm's decision to allow associates to obtain partnership after seven-and-a-half years.
After Milbank announced plans to increase its associate salaries, close to a dozen firms or more have announced they would be matching its scale or better.
But the salary increases have been limited to high-profitability firms, said law firm consultant Brad Hildebrandt.
"Retention and recruiting within the firms that have raised those salaries is pretty intense, because the number of students available to them that would meet the qualifications of those firms is very limited," Hildebrandt said.
He cautioned that most firms in the US are not competing for this same crop of talent, and should tread cautiously when it comes to pressure to announce raises.
"Hopefully sanity will prevail, and there won't be a massive change in associate salaries," Hildebrandt said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
X Ordered to Release Data by German Court Amid Election Interference Concerns
![Compliance With the EU's AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect Compliance With the EU's AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/25/7d/54707a6b409ca288c02206e94940/eu-artificial-intelligence-act-767x633.jpg)
Compliance With the EU's AI Act Lags Behind as First Provisions Take Effect
![Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fa/c2/5b8749a84b7eb919caed3ca3d306/quinn-emanuel-urquhart-sullivan-office-sign-washington-13-767x633.jpg)
Quinn Emanuel's Hamburg Managing Partner and Four-Lawyer Team Jump to Willkie Farr
![Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/11/Trump-Donald-White-House-2019-029-767x633-1.jpg)
Trump ICC Sanctions Condemned as ‘Brazen Attack’ on International Law
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250