DACB warns of legal challenge to new Heathrow runway due to 'serious errors' by DfT
DACB client Heathrow Hub alleges airport expansion proposals were unfairly judged
June 20, 2018 at 06:55 AM
2 minute read
DAC Beachcroft (DACB) has warned that controversial plans for a third runway at Heathrow could face a legal challenge due to "serious errors" by the Department for Transport (DfT).
The firm has written to secretary of state for transport Chris Grayling MP, on behalf of its client Heathrow Hub, to highlight errors in the Airports National Policy Statement, which will be put to MPs for approval in the coming weeks.
Heathrow Hub, which is campaigning for an extended northern runway rather than the new development, says the government "wrongly claimed" that an extended runway would offer lower capacity than a third runway despite being "cheaper, simpler, quieter and quicker" to construct.
DACB has submitted a 21-page report to the DfT outlining the mistake. Planning and environmental partner Christopher Stanwell told Legal Week: "When the airport commission asked people to submit their proposals for Heathrow expansion, it did so on the basis of the proposals expanding the airport's capacity to 700,000 air transport movements.
"It then transpired that it had judged Heathrow Airport Limited's third runway proposal on it increasing its capacity to 740,000 air transport movements. This influenced the Airport Commission's assessment of the relative benefits. The extended runway can also accommodate 740,000 air transport movements, but it was not assessed on this basis."
Air transport movements are any landings or takeoffs that transport passengers. Stanwell added that Heathrow Hub feels its complaints to the DfT and Airports Commission have been ignored and that the expansion decision is not being made using all of the available information.
Heathrow Hub director Jock Lowe added: "The errors the DfT have made in relation to capacity are fundamental and explain why passengers and airlines are being saddled with Heathrow Airport's expensive, complicated third runway instead of our cheaper, simpler, quieter plan."
MPs are expected to vote on the proposals for the third runway within two weeks. If approved, it will pass to a public consultation and judicial review before the government can give planning permission.
The Labour Party today (20 June) dropped its formal support for the planned third runway, citing its environment impact and fears that its benefit would not be felt across the country.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
3 minute read
Lawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Clifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
