Slaughters and Freshfields reveal partner gender pay gap after request by MPs
Magic circle firms include partners in pay gap figures following pressure from MPs
June 20, 2018 at 09:22 AM
3 minute read
Slaughter and May and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer have revealed their gender pay gap data, including partners, in response to a request from the parliamentary committee investigating gender pay gap reporting.
The magic circle firms have handed over their figures in letters published online today by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy select committee, which recently wrote to all five firms to request that they restate their data, including partners.
Slaughters, which this March reported a mean gender pay gap of 14.3% and a 38.5% median gap, has released revised figures that show that when all UK partners are included, the mean gender pay gap is 61.8% and the median gap is 41.6%.
The firm's letter also states that, when including UK partners, it has a mean gender bonus gap of 33.3% and a median gap of 54.8% – the same figures as reported in March.
With partners included, the proportion of men receiving a bonus is 78.5%, lower than the figure of 88.6% for women.
- For more, see Allen & Overy accused by MP of 'dragging its feet' over partner gender pay gap reporting
Meanwhile, Freshfields' letter to the committee reveals that the firm has a mean gender pay gap of 60.4% when partners are included, with a median gap of 34.1%, compared to equivalent figures of 13.9% and 13.3% without partners.
In its letter, Freshfields said it had already decided to include partners in its 2018 reporting next year, with 2017 figures included for transparency.
Including partners, the firm has a 42.2% mean gender bonus gap, a similar proportion to the 41% figure for employees. Taking partners into account, a higher proportion of women receive bonuses than men, at 62.7% and 51.4% respectively.
According to the firm, 22.8% of its partnership identifies as female, while 77.2% indentify as male.
Linklaters and Clifford Chance (CC), both of which included partners in their gender pay reporting in March, also provided figures to the committee, although Allen & Overy was today strongly criticised by committee chair Rachel Reeves MP for failing to do so.
CC said in its reply that in May, London managing partner Michael Bates met with Pinsent Masons senior partner Richard Foley and Law Society vice-president Christina Blacklaws to discuss a more transparent and standardised approach to including partner pay in gender pay reporting.
The current method has faced criticism for failing to provide guidelines for partnerships on how to take account of the pay of members of a firm who are not employees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All“I Bought a £20 Suit From eBay”: How a Social Mobility Scheme Helped Launch a Paul Weiss Associate’s Career
6 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 128 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 2Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 3EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 4Bar Report - Feb. 3
- 5Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250