Why firms need to ensure there is parity around mental and physical health in the workplace
Professor Mark Watson-Gandy, barrister and chair of Mental Health First Aid England, explains why his organisation is campaigning to change the law to include mental health in first aid regulations
June 20, 2018 at 10:42 AM
6 minute read
Professor Mark Watson-Gandy (pictured), barrister and chair of Mental Health First Aid England, explains why his organisation is campaigning to change the law to include mental health in first-aid regulations through the Where's Your Head At? campaign.
In any workplace, employees rightly expect support should they become unwell or have an accident.
If someone cuts themselves or has a fall, it's likely there will be a physical first aider on hand to offer them basic support until professional help arrives. But if someone has a panic attack or is experiencing suicidal thoughts, would the same support be there?
Employers have a duty of care to protect the health of their employees and that includes their mental health. But, as it stands, the Health and Safety At Work Act makes no provision for mental health under first-aid regulations.
According to the World Health Organisation, one in four people will be affected by a mental health condition in their lifetime, and then there are many more who will experience some form of mental distress or health issue. Each year, mental ill health costs the UK economy almost £35bn through reduced productivity, sickness absence and staff turnover.
Surely, it is now time to update the Health and Safety At Work Act to reflect how we have moved on as a society in regards to mental health in the workplace.
Like many industries, the legal sector is facing its own challenges regarding employee mental health. Many employees are beginning to speak out about mental health issues exacerbated by long hours working in high-pressure cultures. The charity LawCare, set up to promote mental wellbeing in the legal community, has seen a surge of callers to its helpline in the past two years.
Some firms – and employers from other industries – have been at the forefront of change, training their line managers in mental health first aid. But we cannot afford to leave anyone behind. To ensure that every employee has the support they need to stay well at work – in the legal sector and beyond – the law needs to be updated to include mental health in the first-aid regulations.
Equipping people with the skills to talk about mental health with knowledge, confidence and without judgement will make a huge difference in tackling the stigma surrounding mental health. And in turn, this will help reduce the impact that mental ill health has on economic productivity. It will better equip employers with the tools to better support their employees at times of crisis.
The journey so far
I became chair of Mental Health First Aid England in 2014 because I am passionate about tackling the stigma around mental health in society. And in the four years since I took on the role, we have made good progress to bring parity around mental and physical health, particularly in the workplace.
The campaign to bring parity to mental and physical health in the workplace began in 2016, when Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) England worked with Norman Lamb MP and organisations including Mind and Unilever to table an Early Day Motion to change the law, on World Mental Health Day. The government then made an applaudable commitment to changing the law and amending the regulations around first-aid provision so that mental health is included.
This change in the law is still to come into effect. Ensuring that it is successfully implemented will require close collaboration between charities in the mental health sector, government, health and safety experts and employers of all sizes and sectors. We will need to hear from the organisations already making great strides to include mental health first aid into their workplaces, including firms such as Freshfields, Hogan Lovells, Farrer & Co, Slaughter and May, EY, Unilever, Deloitte and big employers such as Royal Mail, NHS England and the Civil Service.
To ensure that employers are prepared and able to meet the new regulations, an expert reference group will be set up, representing a range of sectors and interested bodies, which will examine what would go into a mental health first aid box.
For instance, smaller employers are not necessarily required to have physical first aiders on site, but they are required to make some provision around physical first aid – the same is likely to be the case if we apply similar assessment criteria for mental health. It will be a question of what provision looks like for different types and sizes of employer, and this needs to be discussed in some detail. As with physical first aid, there won't be a one-size-fits-all approach.
We must also ensure basic awareness around the mental health risks in the workplace. This will be vital to the success of the regulation change and in promoting meaningful, cultural change.
Rallying support
Having the government's commitment to change the law is an important milestone. Now, we must rally public and employer support around the concept of mental health first aid in the workplace, to ensure that the law is effective once it is put in place.
A new campaign is currently underway to raise awareness about mental health first aid and ensure that this much-needed change in the law is not ignored. The campaign – 'Where's Your Head At?' – is led by mental health campaigner Natasha Devon MBE, Bauer Media and MHFA England. An online petition has attracted more than 65,000 signatures so far, with employer supporters including Ford, WH Smith, Bupa, Mace and Hogan Lovells and backed by charities, including the Samaritans.
To truly tackle the stigma surrounding mental health, specifically in the workplace, health and safety regulations around first aid need to include mental health alongside physical health. Now is a vital moment for shifting the discourse around mental health from awareness into action – I urge you to back the campaign.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyer, Mother and the Dark Night of the Soul: What We Are Doing to Women at Law Firms
Trending Stories
- 128 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 2Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 3EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 4Bar Report - Feb. 3
- 5Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250