Nokia adopts AI technology for contract review as legal chief takes new business-focused role
Chief legal officer appointed president of Nokia Technologies as telecoms giant considers using AI to analyse law firm bills
June 21, 2018 at 08:36 AM
4 minute read
Nokia has launched a new artificial intelligence (AI) tool for its global legal team.
The global telecoms company began using Seal Software – which enables lawyers to analyse legal contracts more quickly – last month.
The Finland-based business has initially begun to use the software in its India legal services centre but has plans to extend its use to its global legal team over time.
Nokia chief legal officer Maria Varsellona – who recently took on the additional title of president of Nokia Technologies – said: "We are at the beginning of the legal AI revolution. We decided to invest in AI now so that our operations can evolve at the same time the technology evolves. AI will enhance the abilities of our legal professionals and help them focus on more value-added tasks."
Varsellona's new role, which she will carry out in tandem with her CLO responsibilities, will see her take the lead on delivering a long-term plan for profitability for Nokia Technologies, the telecoms company's advanced technology and licensing business.
Nokia first signed up to Seal in December, but has spent the past six months training the AI technology ahead of the May launch.
Head of AI for legal, Tony Owens, who also heads up the company's Malaysia and Brunei legal operations, said: "We had a group of eight legal professionals training the AI. It needs 50-200 examples per clause you wish it to find and it takes time, just like a human needs training time. The main advantage of training the AI is that it speeds up our lawyers and makes them more accurate.
"We are starting in India but we will definitely roll it out elsewhere [to other legal departments] within 2018."
Previously, Nokia had spent two years exploring AI options for its legal team, first building its in-house software before moving on to find a larger-scale system.
Owens commented: "In early 2016 we realised we have everything we need at Nokia to build our own artificial intelligence. However, building our own system on a bigger scale would be too much work, so we took a year to analyse all the major companies."
Nokia looked at 15 vendors between the end of 2016 and early 2017 before whittling this list down to two. In order to decide between the two, the company undertook a 'man vs machine' test.
Owens explained: "We had two teams; one lawyer analysing the contract and another checking his work. The other team included the AI system with a human checking the work. Both teams were given one contract and a checklist of 22 risks or factors to look for. We assessed how long it took them and how accurate their work was."
Ultimately, Nokia decided Seal would save the business the most money. Going forward, the company is also exploring whether it could use AI to change its billing processes.
Owens said: "This is not a feature of Seal, but it is possible through AI to analyse bills that we receive from law firms. We are exploring that option. You have thousands of bills from law firms and you can train the AI to work out how long a task typically takes. It can analyse what amount of time is reasonable and also see if a task should be carried out by a more junior lawyer at a lower billable rate."
Varsellona, who joined Nokia Siemens Networks as general counsel in July 2013, became chief legal officer and executive vice-president of Nokia in May 2014. She took on the new title of president earlier this month, replacing Gregory Lee, who will remain at Nokia for a transition period but is no longer on the company's leadership team.
She recently talked to Legal Week sister title Corporate Counsel about her new role and leadership development in law, while also offering some advice for business-inclined lawyers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Inadvertent Disclosures Happen at a Law Firm, Who Is Responsible?
Canadians Mourn the Loss of Two Esteemed Legal Professionals: Alan Young and Jason Moyse
4 minute readLawyers Should Only Use AI For Low-end Tasks, Regulators in Australia Say
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250