Profit margins fall across UK top 50 as staff costs soar
More than half of the UK top 50 have seen their operating profit margin fall since 2013-14
June 22, 2018 at 07:52 AM
3 minute read
Operating profit margins at the UK's largest law firms are continuing to fall despite an increased focus on efficiency, as staff costs rise on the back of weighty associate pay hikes.
An analysis of limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts for the 2016-17 financial year, carried out in conjunction with professional services firm Smith & Williamson, shows that the average profit margin for the UK top 50 has dipped by 1% every year since 2014-15.
More than half of the top 50 have seen their operating profit margin fall since 2013-14, while just four – Fieldfisher, Pinsent Masons, Shoosmiths and DAC Beachcroft – have consistently improved their margin during that period, according to LLP filings.
The downward trend is perhaps surprising given the efforts by many law firms to boost efficiency in recent years, but it can be attributed in part to a concurrent spike in staff costs across the UK top 50, which have risen by a total of more than £1bn since 2014-15.
This increase in staff costs has far outweighed headcount growth, with combined spending on staff across the group rising by 18% since 2014-15 to £6.87bn, against an increase of just 7% in lawyers and staff headcount during the same period.
Individual firm increases vary significantly, peaking with a 20% year-on-year rise in staff costs at Stephenson Harwood, but only two UK top 50 firms saw staff expenses fall during 2016-17 – Weightmans and legacy Olswang. Both of these firms saw staff numbers decrease during the period, in contrast to an average headcount increase of 4% across the whole group.
The majority of the UK top 50 increased spending on staff by double-digit percentages last year, with 27 firms seeing staff costs rise by more than 10% and a further 20 posting single-digit increases.
The fact staff costs outstripped headcount increases reflects the significant associate pay increases ushered in ahead of the Brexit vote from May 2016. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, for example, increased base pay for newly qualified lawyers by 26% to between £85,000 and £97,000, while Linklaters also significantly hiked salaries as UK firms moved in response to pay rises at US rivals.
Across the UK top 50, total lawyer and support staff numbers climbed by 3% to 82,282 from 2015-16 to 2016-17. Twelve firms across the group saw total staff numbers decline, including Freshfields and Clifford Chance (2% and 4% respectively), while 13 saw fee earner numbers drop.
As a percentage of revenue, Linklaters has the most expensive staff in the top 10, spending 49% of its total revenue on staff costs. The figure is narrowly ahead of Freshfields on 48% and a full 7% above the group average of 42%. Insurance-focused firms including BLM, Gateley, DAC Beachcroft, RPC all shell out more on their staff as a percentage of revenue, with BLM topping the ranking at 62%.
This is the third in a series of articles analysing the 2016-17 LLP accounts of the UK top 50, in association with Smith & Williamson. For more, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHong Kong IPO Market Shows Signs of Slow but Steady Recovery
Can AI Beat the Billable Hour? Legal Tech Firms Say Selling AI Products to Law Firms Still a Challenge
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250