'Billable hours do not help innovation' – the tech conundrums law firms are grappling with
Speakers from KPMG, Freshfields and Baker McKenzie discuss top tech issues at the Legal Week Strategic Technology Forum 2018
June 25, 2018 at 08:09 AM
3 minute read
Law firms' dependence on hourly billing is holding them back from devising new, more efficient ways of working, according to Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer chief legal innovation officer Isabel Parker.
Parker told attendees at Legal Week's Strategic Technology Forum 2018 – which took place in Italy last week – that "billable hours do not help innovation".
She argued that firms need to move away from hourly billing in order to encourage their partners to adopt more innovative ways of working and speed up client service. She said: "If partners in any firm think it's still acceptable to charge clients for that firm's inefficiencies, it's not; and clients welcome a move towards more fixed pricing."
Her remarks came during the second day of the annual event at Lake Maggiore, in a session entitled 'Maximising AI: What are the opportunities for law firms?' Sitting alongside Parker on the panel were Alphaserve Technologies chief executive officer Arup Das, Davies information technology director Ivaylo Nikolov and LCA innovation officer Marco Imperiale.
Parker added that she is "occasionally still met with blank faces" from partners when trying to push for change. Instead, she is encouraged by associates at Freshfields who are moving the narrative forward to "embed cultural change" across the firm.
Meanwhile, during another panel discussion on how law firms are adapting to new challenges, firms were encouraged to collaborate with third parties to provide better client service.
KPMG partner and head of digital disruption Shamus Rae said some firms are "embarrassed" to admit to clients that they are partnering with outside organisations, and that some are "not prepared to accept some services can do a better job providing services than the ones they already have".
He was joined on the panel (pictured above) by Fulcrum Global Technologies senior vice-president and EMEA chief Martin Telfer, LOD co-founder Jonathan Brenner, Axiom Europe managing director Sandra Devine, Baker McKenzie executive director James Richards and Riverview Law non-executive director Adam Shutkever.
Richards, who leads Bakers' Belfast global services legal centre, said that developments in automated tech mean day-to-day work is not always "valuable enough to be done by expensive human beings". He added that in the future, lawyers need expertise in these new ways of working and should be "the gatekeepers of new technology".
Cybersecurity also featured on the agenda, with last year's dramatic cyberattack at DLA Piper mentioned within the opening remarks from co-chair Derek Southall, head of innovation and digital at Gowling WLG.
The session examined law firms' adoption of cloud-based services, with panel member and Mimecast senior vice-president and chief trust officer Marc French stating that law firms' number one concern when choosing a cloud provider is security assurance.
He said: "If a customer comes back and says, 'I'm uncomfortable', we show them what we can do to increase their comfort level – we employ independent security assessors, we work directly with your incident response teams and we show them the size of our security teams."
He also encouraged firms not to think of the services as an efficiency measure, highlighting that businesses will more often pay more for cloud services, because "they are buying innovation or resources they are unable to staff themselves".
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuzzwords, Bad Wine & Broken Social Contract: The Rise of Boring Legal Conferences
'We Shouldn't Expect this From Law Firms': Clients Discuss Workload in Aftermath of Pinsents Tragedy
3 minute readSmiling Too Much? Why Some Lawyers' Partnership Ambitions 'Crash and Burn'
Legal Sector Must Learn to 'Fail Quickly' on Technology, Partners Say
Trending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250