Top UK law firms rethink stance on relationships at work post #MeToo scrutiny
Linklaters and HSF have both brought in new policies which mean staff must disclose relationships at work - which other firms are following suit?
June 26, 2018 at 09:27 AM
4 minute read
The wave of #MeToo revelations across the legal profession has turned the spotlight on the policies law firms have in place to protect their employees from sexual harassment and other inappropriate behaviour in the workplace.
Linklaters and Herbert Smith Freehills have both taken action, bringing in whistleblowing hotlines and new requirements for staff to disclose personal relationships at work – so will others follow suit?
Four other major law firms have now told Legal Week that they are actively reviewing their policies on workplace relationships, including Dentons, which experienced its own #MeToo episode earlier this year when a partner was ousted after an investigation into his behaviour while he was at Scottish merger partner Maclay Murray & Spens.
The firm confirmed it is now looking at how it might "provide further guidance on relationships at work".
Other firms reviewing their procedures around personal relationships include CMS, which said the subject was currently under discussion "with a view to a formal policy being introduced in future", while Irwin Mitchell confirmed that it is "looking closely" at the issues relating to disclosure.
Elsewhere, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP), now into its third month post-merger, said that while it had policies in place for its legacy UK and US firms, it is considering creating new processes regarding relationship disclosure and whistleblowing for the combined firm.
A number of other UK top 20 law firms, including Allen & Overy (A&O), Ashurst, Simmons & Simmons, Pinsent Masons, Clyde & Co, Gowling WLG and Taylor Wessing have had policies regarding whistleblowing or the disclosure of personal relationships in place for some time.
Gowling WLG has a confidential reporting portal for staff to anonymously raise concerns over any wrongdoing, and while it does not have a policy regarding the disclosure of personal relationships, the firm does ensure individuals who have made management aware of their relationships do not report directly to each other.
A&O, meanwhile, said that while workplace relationships are not prohibited by the firm, it does require those in a relationship that involves a senior member of a team to notify their local HR contact.
At Simmons and Ashurst, partners are obliged to disclose relationships with other members of staff under its partnership code of conduct, which has been in place for a number of years. Simmons has also attempted to confront the stigma around whistleblowing with the introduction of 'confidantes', who provide a 'safe place' for staff to discuss confidential issues at any time.
"Confidantes are available to support anyone in the firm who wishes to approach them and who believes they have faced issues of sexual harassment and/or bullying first-hand," a Simmons spokesperson explained.
At Taylor Wessing, the firm launched a whistleblowing initiative dubbed 'Calling It Out' two years ago, and now has an employee assistance helpline, overseen by an external company, which employees and their family members can use to speak confidentially about work-related and personal issues, including bullying, relationships, balancing work and home life, depression and anxiety.
Hogan Lovells said it has "support mechanisms" for its staff relating to the disclosure of personal relationships, as well as clear processes for whistleblowing, while DLA Piper has varying whistleblowing and disclosure policies in place in the many jurisdictions in which it operates around the world.
DLA Piper added that it seeks to "strike a balance between the right to privacy and, where appropriate, ensuring there is a necessary level of transparency to ensure we maintain the right workplace environment".
Some firms have not introduced any formal policies, with Eversheds Sutherland confirming that it does not have anything in place regarding whistleblowing or personal relationships, and has no immediate plans to implement anything, although this may change in the longer term. Norton Rose Fulbright, meanwhile, said that while it it does have policies in the US and Canada, it does not have a global policy covering relationships at work in the UK.
Of the other magic circle firms, Clifford Chance encourages staff to disclose work relationships, but it is not mandatory, while Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughter and May do not have specific policies in place but instead trust their lawyers to take a common-sense approach and encourage an environment that commits to treat people fairly.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Law Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250