Magic circle associate alleges sexual assault by partner and slams firm's handling of investigation
Allegations detailed in written submission to parliamentary committee investigating NDAs
July 09, 2018 at 07:50 AM
4 minute read
A former junior lawyer at a magic circle firm has alleged that they were sexually assaulted by a partner at the firm and has strongly criticised the subsequent investigation into the incident.
The claims are detailed in a written submission to the Women and Equalities Committee, published today (9 July), with the lawyer in question asking to remain anonymous to avoid jeopardising "any future tribunal proceeding or criminal trial".
In the letter, the lawyer – who has since left the firm in question – states that "the route to achieving a satisfactory outcome is continuing", and that they "remain committed to the individual concerned being appropriately sanctioned".
The lawyer says the episode caused "significant harm" to their mental health, and that they felt compelled to agree to a "confidentiality undertaking", the negotiation of which "contributed significantly" to their distress.
The remarks were submitted to the parliamentary committee as evidence for its ongoing inquiry into the use of non-disclosure agreements relating to allegations of sexual harassment in the workplace.
In the lawyer's submission, they criticise the firm's internal investigation of their complaint, stating that "it was clear that the firm was not prepared for, and lacking in the relevant expertise, to deal with a complaint of such a serious nature".
Following the conclusion of the investigation, the lawyer reported the incident to the Solicitor's Regulation Authority (SRA) due to their "dissatisfaction" with the process. The lawyer adds: "Whilst I am generally encouraged by the SRA in terms of the seriousness with which they continue to handle my own complaint, I remain concerned about the length of time the process is taking. This should be reviewed, and in particular the SRA should consider whether certain standardised time periods within their investigation and tribunal processes could be abridged in exceptional circumstances, such as in circumstances of serious sexual misconduct."
The submission also calls for law firms to introduce mandatory sexual harassment and alcohol policies, claiming there is a particular need for policies "in large City firms, where there is a culture of excessive consumption of alcohol, and where incidents of sexual misconduct are rife". The letter argues for an "industry standard" for sexual harassment and alcohol policies, "possibly in conjunction with the SRA and rape and sexual assault support organisations", which law firms could be required to publicly sign up for.
The lawyer in question also argues that when investigating claims of sexual misconduct, firms should "acknowledge that testing the veracity of evidence, to the same standard expected and required in a criminal trial, is neither possible nor appropriate in the employment/workplace context", and that they should be "encouraged not to 'hide' behind the high standard of proof required to achieve a conviction in a criminal trial".
Earlier this year, the SRA warned law firms in England and Wales not to use NDAs to prevent the reporting of professional misconduct within their own businesses, in the wake of several sexual harassment scandals that have rocked the profession, while the Equality and Human Rights Commission has told the magic circle that it could take legal action if they fail to take appropriate action to prevent and respond to sexual harassment in the workplace.
Baker McKenzie is currently conducting an external review into its handling of a historic sexual assault allegation involving a senior partner, while a number of other major law firms have ousted partners after allegations of inappropriate behaviour, including Linklaters, Herbert Smith Freehills, Dentons and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
Last year, Legal Week research found that nearly two thirds of female lawyers have experienced some form of sexual harassment while working at a law firm, with more than half experiencing it on more than one occasion. A number of female lawyers also spoke anonymously to Legal Week about their experiences of sexual harassment in the profession, following the research.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIndia’s Cyril Amarchand Bolsters Real Estate Offering, Hires 7-Lawyer Team From Luthra and Luthra
Withers Hires Disputes Partner From Morgan Lewis to Lead Litigation Group in Singapore
Kirkland, Hengeler, DLA Piper Advise on Metro Supermarket Delisting in Frankfurt
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250