Magic circle associate alleges sexual assault by partner and slams firm's handling of investigation
Allegations detailed in written submission to parliamentary committee investigating NDAs
July 09, 2018 at 07:50 AM
4 minute read
A former junior lawyer at a magic circle firm has alleged that they were sexually assaulted by a partner at the firm and has strongly criticised the subsequent investigation into the incident.
The claims are detailed in a written submission to the Women and Equalities Committee, published today (9 July), with the lawyer in question asking to remain anonymous to avoid jeopardising "any future tribunal proceeding or criminal trial".
In the letter, the lawyer – who has since left the firm in question – states that "the route to achieving a satisfactory outcome is continuing", and that they "remain committed to the individual concerned being appropriately sanctioned".
The lawyer says the episode caused "significant harm" to their mental health, and that they felt compelled to agree to a "confidentiality undertaking", the negotiation of which "contributed significantly" to their distress.
The remarks were submitted to the parliamentary committee as evidence for its ongoing inquiry into the use of non-disclosure agreements relating to allegations of sexual harassment in the workplace.
In the lawyer's submission, they criticise the firm's internal investigation of their complaint, stating that "it was clear that the firm was not prepared for, and lacking in the relevant expertise, to deal with a complaint of such a serious nature".
Following the conclusion of the investigation, the lawyer reported the incident to the Solicitor's Regulation Authority (SRA) due to their "dissatisfaction" with the process. The lawyer adds: "Whilst I am generally encouraged by the SRA in terms of the seriousness with which they continue to handle my own complaint, I remain concerned about the length of time the process is taking. This should be reviewed, and in particular the SRA should consider whether certain standardised time periods within their investigation and tribunal processes could be abridged in exceptional circumstances, such as in circumstances of serious sexual misconduct."
The submission also calls for law firms to introduce mandatory sexual harassment and alcohol policies, claiming there is a particular need for policies "in large City firms, where there is a culture of excessive consumption of alcohol, and where incidents of sexual misconduct are rife". The letter argues for an "industry standard" for sexual harassment and alcohol policies, "possibly in conjunction with the SRA and rape and sexual assault support organisations", which law firms could be required to publicly sign up for.
The lawyer in question also argues that when investigating claims of sexual misconduct, firms should "acknowledge that testing the veracity of evidence, to the same standard expected and required in a criminal trial, is neither possible nor appropriate in the employment/workplace context", and that they should be "encouraged not to 'hide' behind the high standard of proof required to achieve a conviction in a criminal trial".
Earlier this year, the SRA warned law firms in England and Wales not to use NDAs to prevent the reporting of professional misconduct within their own businesses, in the wake of several sexual harassment scandals that have rocked the profession, while the Equality and Human Rights Commission has told the magic circle that it could take legal action if they fail to take appropriate action to prevent and respond to sexual harassment in the workplace.
Baker McKenzie is currently conducting an external review into its handling of a historic sexual assault allegation involving a senior partner, while a number of other major law firms have ousted partners after allegations of inappropriate behaviour, including Linklaters, Herbert Smith Freehills, Dentons and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
Last year, Legal Week research found that nearly two thirds of female lawyers have experienced some form of sexual harassment while working at a law firm, with more than half experiencing it on more than one occasion. A number of female lawyers also spoke anonymously to Legal Week about their experiences of sexual harassment in the profession, following the research.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 2The Lawyers Picked by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Term
- 3Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 4Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 5Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250