Government cyber unit stresses legal sector threats and urges firms to protect themselves
Lawyers acknowledge scale of cyber security threat amid growing need for preventative measures
July 24, 2018 at 04:26 AM
4 minute read
The Government's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has called on law firms to take action to protect themselves from cyberattacks, amid concerns that many do not have adequate systems in place to ward off threats to their IT infrastructure.
The NCSC, which was launched last February, has released a 'legal sector threat report' designed to "encourage industrywide adoption of cybersecurity best practice", citing the growing financial and reputational impact of attacks on law firm systems.
The report states that between April 2016 to March 2017, the Solicitors Regulation Authority received reports of cyberattacks resulting in total losses of £11m in client money, while PwC's 2017 law firm survey found that more than 60% of all law firms reported suffering some form of security incident during the previous year.
Perhaps the loudest warning shot came in June last year, when DLA Piper suffered a ransomware attack that shook the firm's IT infrastructure, triggering lengthy global disruption.
Many senior lawyers acknowledge that firms are not doing enough to protect themselves from threats such as data breaches, phishing and malware.
Mark Shillito (pictured), global head of intellectual property at Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF), says cybercrime is "one of the risks that's on every board's mind – and if it isn't, it should be".
"Everyone needs to think about it," he says, "especially law firms, because of the role they play in the commercial value chain – it's right that the government is getting behind that."
According to Shillito, HSF is making efforts to ensure its staff are alert to such threats. "We've adopted hacker-type tactics to help train our staff; setting up scenarios and sending fake phishing emails – you've got to keep people on top of that," he says. "You can't relax, because it's neverending.
"You've got nation-state attackers, but also ordinary decent criminals, so you've really got to get serious about this stuff. We also have an information security group, which ensures that we are protecting our own and our client's information, and doing everything we can to minimise risk."
Bird & Bird commercial partner Simon Shooter, who regularly speaks on the topic of cybersecurity, says he is surprised to see how few businesses are protecting themselves against increasingly sophisticated threats.
"We're seeing 100% acceptance that cyber risk is a major business risk. Most would put it in their top five [business concerns]. But how many have a response plan? You'll see only 40%-50% of hands in the air.
"Professional services firms have been identified for a long time as a target because of the valuable data and valuable information [they hold], and law firms are as critically exposed as anyone due to things like trade secrets and the sensitive client information they hold.
"The government is saying that businesses need to do a lot more than they're doing, and need to look after themselves."
The NCSC report also highlights a number of industry trends that have made the legal sector particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks, including the rise of automation, the disaggregation of legal services, as well as the use of a widening range of technologies.
Linklaters counsel Peter Church, whose practice focuses on data privacy and e-commerce regulation, says the NCSC's report is a "timely reminder to law firms of ongoing cyber risks", which "highlights the need to ensure they have in place proper processes to protect client data and funds".
Church points in particular to the rise of cloud computing within law firms as posing a "particularly interesting challenge". The cloud offers many benefits for law firms and Church believes that, while it "opens up risks, it also offers more security, particularly for smaller firms which do not have the funds or the resources to arm themselves".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
- 2GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
- 3As Political Extremism Rises, is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
- 4So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 5US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250