Fieldfisher surges up AIM adviser rankings as Pinsents and Gowling WLG share top spot
Fieldfisher adds seven new AIM clients during Q3 as capital markets partners shrug off Brexit fears
July 30, 2018 at 05:11 AM
4 minute read
Fieldfisher has made the biggest gain in the AIM adviser rankings during the last quarter, adding seven new clients to rise five places up the table.
Gowling WLG and Pinsent Masons have retained their status as the top two firms by AIM-listed clients, with the pair now level on 50 clients apiece after seeing their totals drop by one and two respectively during the quarter.
Fieldfisher has risen to sixth place after boosting its AIM-listed client roster from 27 and 34, a result corporate partner Anthony Brockbank attributed in part to the firm's sector focus.
"We've always had a significant standing in the marketplace on the advisory side, but we're now beginning to focus more on the company aspect," said Brockbank.
The firm recently advised on a $575m acquisition of US assets by AIM-listed Diversified Gas & Oil – a deal described as the largest-ever AIM oil and gas acquisition – and Brockbank highlighted the energy sector as being a key contributor to the firm's recent AIM market success, as well as healthcare, where Fieldfisher is "looking to make a push".
Pinsents, a consistently strong AIM performer, has remained top of the rankings alongside Gowling WLG, with corporate partner Jon Harris citing the firm's traditional focus on being "empathetic, warm and relationship-focused".
"It's a very competitive market", he said. "We've been very focused on project management and doing what the client wants, which we've been able to achieve through our connections."
CMS, which recently completed its financial year after its merger with Nabarro and Olswang, placed third in the rankings after dropping one client to 39. Equity capital markets head Alasdair Steele pointed to the firm's pre-merger focus on the company-side issuer practice, as well as maintaining its bank-side specialism, but suggested that the introduction of Nabarro's issuer focus had seen the firm focus more on AIM-listed clients.
"We're continuing to grow our practice," he said, adding: "We want to be number one, of course, and also grow our main market as well as our AIM practices too. Issuers provide us with opportunities for other work in M&A as well as other areas. And we'd look to focus on the small-mid cap space – so that's the top of the AIM, bottom of the main market."
Recent additions to CMS's roster of capital markets clients include AIM-listed payments operator SafeCharge and trade exhibition organiser ITE Group, which sits on the main market.
The Brexit question
Pinsents' Harris played down the possible ill-effects of Brexit, saying that the firm is "not seeing Brexit as a big problem". He added: "What we might see is clients building a secondary fundraiser – a war chest – a good store of cash in the bank. Clients may start recognising the need to do a secondary fundraiser with maximum efficiency and minimum fuss.
"Clients are always cautious about legal expenses, but we might see them being a bit more sensible," he added.
Steele echoed this perspective. "I'm pretty sanguine about [Brexit]," he said. "Since 2008, businesses have been operating in a new uncertain world. We can see the bumps, but these will likely be part of a temporary blip. It's part and parcel of the equity capital markets business. We always have bumps."
However, he accepted there will be complexities to navigate: "The question is – where does the client see the riskier issues? Banks too will be managing these risks. Issuers will be asking a lot more questions of banks before they embark on a relatively expensive process. Clients will be asking themselves: 'Should we invest the time and expense?'"
While sharing Harris and Steele's overall uncertainty, Brockbank expects a quieter 2019 – in Q1 especially – likening the immediate Brexit aftermath to post-referendum conditions: "Following the vote, things were pretty quiet. There was a sort of paralysis in the market, and we may see something similar."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250