Taylor Wessing boosts NQ pay by £8,000
13% pay rise follows record revenue for the firm in 2017/18
August 02, 2018 at 09:07 AM
2 minute read
Taylor Wessing has handed out an £8,000 raise to its newly qualified lawyers (NQs), taking their yearly pay to £71,000.
The 13% increase comes alongside the firm's decision to hold trainee salaries at £40,000 for first-year trainees and £44,000 for second-year trainees. The pay changes came into effect last month.
Graduate recruitment partners Kirstie McGuigan and Matthew Royle said: "We've received such positive feedback this year on our trainee development programme, and recognition through a number of awards for the experience and support we provide. Our trainee 'class of 2016′ is one of our latest success stories.
"They've all made a significant contribution to the growth we have celebrated in recent years and this increase reflects that. We're also really pleased that so many of them are staying with us."
Some 91% of the firm's most recent trainee intake were offered a position to stay on at the firm as of July 2018.
The salary increases come after the firm posted a record revenue high of £301.5m in the 2017-18 financial year. The 12% increase in global revenues saw the firm pass the £300m mark, in what managing partner Tim Eyles (pictured) described as its "best year yet".
Last month, Herbert Smith Freehills confirmed it was overhauling its UK associate pay scale, moving to distance itself from experience as the basis of remuneration in preference for more merit-linked pay.
The Anglo-Australian firm has introduced 'career milestones', dividing its associate rank into three bands, within which individual pay will be determined by performance.
The first band runs from NQ to two years' post-qualification experience, with total compensation for the band stretching from £93,000 at the bottom to £114,000 for the best performers.
The US market has seen more dramatic changes. In June, Cravath Swaine & Moore confirmed its rates for first-year associates will now start at $190,000 (£144,000) and rise to $305,000 (£231,500) after five years.
In the US, other firms to have matched Cravath's payscale include Clifford Chance, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Kirkland & Ellis, Ropes & Gray and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 2Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 3SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 4Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 5Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250