Taylor Wessing boosts NQ pay by £8,000
13% pay rise follows record revenue for the firm in 2017/18
August 02, 2018 at 09:07 AM
2 minute read
Taylor Wessing has handed out an £8,000 raise to its newly qualified lawyers (NQs), taking their yearly pay to £71,000.
The 13% increase comes alongside the firm's decision to hold trainee salaries at £40,000 for first-year trainees and £44,000 for second-year trainees. The pay changes came into effect last month.
Graduate recruitment partners Kirstie McGuigan and Matthew Royle said: "We've received such positive feedback this year on our trainee development programme, and recognition through a number of awards for the experience and support we provide. Our trainee 'class of 2016′ is one of our latest success stories.
"They've all made a significant contribution to the growth we have celebrated in recent years and this increase reflects that. We're also really pleased that so many of them are staying with us."
Some 91% of the firm's most recent trainee intake were offered a position to stay on at the firm as of July 2018.
The salary increases come after the firm posted a record revenue high of £301.5m in the 2017-18 financial year. The 12% increase in global revenues saw the firm pass the £300m mark, in what managing partner Tim Eyles (pictured) described as its "best year yet".
Last month, Herbert Smith Freehills confirmed it was overhauling its UK associate pay scale, moving to distance itself from experience as the basis of remuneration in preference for more merit-linked pay.
The Anglo-Australian firm has introduced 'career milestones', dividing its associate rank into three bands, within which individual pay will be determined by performance.
The first band runs from NQ to two years' post-qualification experience, with total compensation for the band stretching from £93,000 at the bottom to £114,000 for the best performers.
The US market has seen more dramatic changes. In June, Cravath Swaine & Moore confirmed its rates for first-year associates will now start at $190,000 (£144,000) and rise to $305,000 (£231,500) after five years.
In the US, other firms to have matched Cravath's payscale include Clifford Chance, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Kirkland & Ellis, Ropes & Gray and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMalaysia’s Shearn Delamore Set To Expand Local Footprint With New Office Launch
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions During Q&A
- 2Nondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
- 3Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 4Lessons From Five Popular Change Management Concepts: A Guide for Law Firm Leaders in 2025
- 5People in the News—Jan. 15, 2025—Ballard Spahr, Brahin Law
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250