A crisis hits: strategies for GCs to manage what happens next...
A crisis presents an opportunity for in-house lawyers to demonstrate the commercial value they bring to their business
August 08, 2018 at 08:44 AM
3 minute read
In today's delicate business environment, your next major crisis could be just around the corner. And if the unthinkable happens, in the fast-moving world of instant news, what once might have been kept in-house today can more easily leak out, heavily affecting your share price and damaging your brand in the blink of an eye.
Such a public scenario presents a significant business challenge. But, as with any significant challenge, it brings significant opportunity, too. A significant opportunity for in-house lawyers to demonstrate the commercial value they bring to their business.
So, what's your role as GC?
Number one: be prepared. No matter what the crisis – cyber breach; employee behaviour; regulatory scrutiny – you need to get a crisis response team in place, and quickly. And there's a strong argument to say that the GC should be leading that group. Of course, many of today's more sophisticated organisations will have established response teams and plans agreed and rehearsed in advance. But it's surprising how many don't. If you fall into the latter camp, the time to be getting your protocols in place and establishing leadership is now, not when the challenge has arrived.
And you should assume that, no matter how hard you might try to contain the situation, it will become public at some point. You might be pleasantly surprised; but if the media does come calling, you need to know how best to handle them. This is where, once again, having the right team in place can reap benefits. Dialogue with journalists needs input from the PR or comms team, so prior identification is helpful.
And then there's the potential for a select committee requesting an appearance. Many of us will have watched select committees play out on TV, thinking "there but for the grace of God". If you do find your company put through the wringer by a group of MPs, then the best advice – no matter how much you might not want to – is likely to be to play their game, in your way. And as with any game, preparation is key. And understanding the rules of engagement is critical. Turning up with an army of lawyers rarely goes down well. And coming out swinging is high risk. You may need to prepare your CEO for the fact they might have to take one or two blows.
Crises are unpredictable by nature. The role of the GC – and, frankly, where the GC can add great value to the business – is to try to mitigate that unpredictability by being as prepared as possible for when the problem strikes.
Jeremy Drew is head of the commercial, IP, technology and media group at RPC. A version of this article was previously published by the author on LinkedIn.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSponsored post: find out about the latest legal technology trends at ndElevate EMEA
GDPR three months on: what have we learned since the new data privacy rules took effect?
Innovation driven by a different perspective leads to a whole new way of working with clients: advertising feature
Trending Stories
- 1Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 2Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 3Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 43rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 5Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250