Clifford Chance agrees to pay $132,000 penalty in US discrimination case
Magic circle firm settles immigration-related claims tied to document review project
August 29, 2018 at 12:00 AM
3 minute read
By C Ryan Barber
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
In court and at the negotiation table, US Justice Department prosecutors and defence lawyers from big firms often take differing views of the law. Less common is the case in which a different view of the law makes the firm, and not the client, the focus of a government investigation.
Clifford Chance (CC) found itself in that position over its apparent misunderstanding of data-access regulations concerning the export of defence and military equipment. On Wednesday (29 August), the firm agreed to pay a $132,000 civil penalty, along with lost wages to three unidentified individuals, to resolve a Justice Department investigation into the firm's refusal last year to allow dual citizens and non-US citizens to work on a document review project.
According to the Justice Department, CC unlawfully shut out dual citizens, along with non-citizens authorized to work in the US, based on the firm's misreading of regulations that limit access to certain sensitive information. The settlement papers did not reveal the identity of the client.
CC, according to the settlement document, restricted its staffing to US citizens in a "good faith" effort to comply with the data access rules set by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
But the Justice Department said the regulations also allow US nationals, lawful permanent residents, asylees and refugees to access certain sensitive information covered by those national security rules.
A CC spokesperson said the firm was "pleased to reach a settlement on this matter." The spokesperson declined to identify the client for the document review project.
Justice officials said ITAR regulations do not limit sensitive information to only US citizens. Indeed, the regulations also give access to US nationals, lawful permanent residents, asylees, and refugees, the department said. The department cautioned that employers that limit their hiring to US citizens without a proper legal basis run the risk of violating the Immigration and Nationality Act's anti-discrimination provisions.
"Employers subject to the ITAR must be careful not to engage in unlawful discrimination against US workers," John Gore, acting assistant attorney in charge of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said in a statement. "The Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that employers do not unlawfully exclude US citizens and work authorised non-US citizens from employment opportunities."
CC general counsel James Paul signed the agreement for the firm, which did not admit guilt.
Under the settlement, CC will be subject to DOJ monitoring and reporting requirements for two years. The firm must also train employees on the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act and inform clients who request citizenship-based hiring restrictions of the law's requirements.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThreat of Trump Tariffs Is Sign Canada Needs to Wean Off Reliance on Trade with U.S., Trade Lawyers Say
5 minute readMintz Adds 3 New Partners in Toronto, Bringing Its Canadian Office Lawyer Head Count To 35
4 minute read'Headaches,' Opportunities Ahead for Corporate and Trade Lawyers Advising Foreign Businesses
4 minute readUS-Based Smith, Gambrell & Russell Expands to Italy With Cross-Border Transactional Attorneys
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250