A&O reports 2018 gender pay gap data alongside 2017 figures following delay
The firm has reported its 2018 figures after facing criticism for delaying 2017 report
September 06, 2018 at 08:59 AM
5 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) has released details of its gender pay gap – including partners – for both 2018 and 2017, after facing criticism from MPs for being the last of the magic circle to do so.
The firm has now released its figures for both 2018 and 2017, revealing that for 2017, when including partners, it had the second largest mean gender pay gap among the magic circle.
The firm's combined UK partner and employees gender pay gap for 2017 is 65%, just below Clifford Chance (66.3%), but above the other three magic circle firms, all of which reported mean pay gaps of between 60% and 62%.
However, A&O has also released its 2018 figures, which do show an improvement, with the pay gap falling to 61.2%.
On a median basis, the 2017 pay gap is 42.1%, improving to 39% for 2018.
In the report, senior partner Wim Dejonghe says: "Changing practices and behaviours that have existed around the world for decades is hard, but we have to work every day to do just that. We have to address diversity and gender balance right at the top of our business by really committing to change – by introducing targets and holding ourselves accountable for them, and by measuring progress all the time.
"We have to address diversity at the bottom by understanding where the barriers really are (not where we've assumed they are for years) and by challenging outdated perceptions and practices when we see them in the daily realities here – whether that's checking biases and assumptions, or providing better emergency childcare and hub offices to reduce commuting times.
"We had a very open debate about diversity and inclusion at our global partners' conference this year, and know we need to look harder for and support diverse talent wherever it exists – not just assume the best people will always make it to the top."
The release of the figures comes several months after a request from the parliamentary committee investigating gender pay gap reporting. A&O had been criticised for "dragging its feet" in asking for until September to provide its figures after the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy select committee wrote to all five magic circle firms to request that they restate their data, including partners, earlier this year.
A&O has also released data for its Belfast office, which houses more than 100 legal professionals. In 2017, the mean hourly gender pay gap was 14%, dipping slightly to 13.8% in 2018.
The report also details the split between bonuses paid to men and women during both years. In 2017, bonuses were paid out to slightly more men than women in the UK, with 55.5% of men receiving a bonus compared to 53.2% of women.
For 2018, both UK figures increased dramatically, with a greater proportion of women taking home bonuses. Some 79.6% of women received a bonus in the last financial year, compared to 74.8% of men.
However, the mean bonus gap still swung in favour of men in both years, with a 42.1% gap in 2017 and a 45.3% gap the following year.
A&O HR director Sasha Hardman told Legal Week: "We are focused on women's career progression, and until that improves there won't be a material impact on the gender pay gap."
A&O has also included ethnicity pay gap figures in its report, and has committed to doing so in subsequent years.
Currently, 14% of A&O's UK partner and employee population are black, asian or minority ethnic (BAME) and the firm has reported a mean pay gap of 22.8% for that group in 2017 and 21.6% for 2018.
All four of the other magic circle firms have already released their pay gap data with partners included, with CC and Linklaters doing so voluntarily this March, and Freshfields and Slaughters disclosing their figures in May in response to the demand from the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee.
Slaughters' revised figures showed that when all its UK partners are included, the mean gender pay gap is 61.8%. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has a mean gender pay gap of 60.4% when partners are included, Linklaters with 60.3% and CC with 66.3%.
Discussions over the possibility of a more standardised approach to including partners in pay gap reporting are taking place, and this May, CC London managing partner Michael Bates and Pinsent Masons senior partner Richard Foley met with new Law Society president Christina Blacklaws to look at how to encourage more transparency next year.
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee's final report on the effectiveness of the first year of reporting, published this August, called for partners to be included in next year's reporting, describing their exclusion as making "a nonsense" of efforts to tackle the pay gap.
The gender pay gap will be a topic of discussion at Legal Week CONNECT 2018, with senior lawyers and in house counsel offering their opinions during the event.
For more, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readKing & Spalding, Weil, Gotshal & Manges Launch Pro Bono Legal Initiative for Tennis Players
2 minute readTrump Ordered to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days After Rejecting Costs Order
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AIAs: A Look At the Future of AI-Related Contracts
- 2Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 5Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250