HSF lawyers develop in-house cyber platform to assist clients with security breaches
The firm has developed software that identifies data and clients affected in a breach
September 19, 2018 at 07:22 AM
4 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills' (HSF) in-house cybersecurity team has built and developed a new tech platform to help clients respond quickly in the aftermath of a data breach.
The new offering has already been trialled on a number of personal data breaches, demonstrating significant cost savings.
Under new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rules, once an organisation has established that a personal data breach has occurred, it must report the scale of the leak to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) within 72 hours, while it may also be required to inform affected individuals.
These requirements are particularly challenging when organisations face sifting through massive volumes of unstructured data.
HSF global cybersecurity head Andrew Moir, who took a lead role on the project, explained: "A client could be in a situation where they have thousands of emails which have been breached, and you don't immediately know what's in them and who they relate to. Historically, you'd do a manual review with teams of lawyers itemising the personal data within the documents. It can be very time consuming, and we thought there must be a better way to do it. This is a way into the data, and gives you the visibility upfront you wouldn't have otherwise."
The platform is trained to pick out personal data from the breached information sources – for example documents, emails or spreadsheets – and can then link that personal data back to the person affected. The tool can also create automatic distribution lists so that the client can notify the individuals directly.
The software can also provide demographics of the breach, which will help the organisation assess what international regulatory regimes will apply.
According to Moir: "In some cases where we've used this tool, we've actually avoided doing a significant review of the underlying materials at all. When there's no review or a very targeted review, the cost can be of the order of 10%-20%. It depends how much data there is – the economies of scale are greater for larger breaches. In a matter we did recently – a medium-size breach with over a hundred gigabytes of data – the costs associated were about 20%."
Because the software can also identify documents that contain the most significant personal data, any manual review which is considered necessary – for example on a high-profile breach attracting more attention from regulators – will be of fewer documents and take far less time. Moir says the cost can still be less than half of a manual review.
In creating the platform, Moir said the cybersecurity team cut development time and avoided complex processes that come with outsourcing development and testing, due to the fact that lawyers in the team have coding skills. This project used a combination of programming languages C# and SQL.
He added: "It took us a little while to turn the idea into a reality, but we also needed to develop the process around it. It needs to be defensible, and for any given breach the regulator will need to be satisfied that it's an appropriate way to proceed. We've used it in matters already and as long as you're in a position to justify your approach when the time comes, you should be fine with the ICO."
Moir has previously written software to help settle ownership disputes for financial algorithms, and has also developed a number of home-automation apps that are on sale in the Google Play store: "I've been coding since I was knee-high – I was part of the generation that grew up with a computer. The difference with me is that I've maintained it. When I decided to be a lawyer, I didn't stop doing it."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Strengthens Tokyo Office With Partner Hire From Big Four Japanese Firm AMT
K&L Gates Duo Leaves to Reunite with Former Leader at Sreenivasan Chambers
Clifford Chance Among Advisers as Prince Harry Newspaper Hearing Begins
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250