Keystone continues post-IPO revenue growth with 30% half-year hike
Profit growth continues amid busy period of recruitment for newly listed firm
September 25, 2018 at 06:29 AM
4 minute read
Keystone Law has reported a 29.9% increase in revenue for the first half of 2018, in the firm's second set of financial results since it became the third UK law firm to list on the London Stock Exchange in November last year.
The firm – which reported revenue of £31.6m for the year ending 31 January 2018 – took in £19.9m during the six months to 31 July, up from £15.3m last year, alongside 40.3% growth in pre-tax profits to £2.3m.
On the back of the figures, stockbroker Panmure Gordon has upgraded its forecast for Keystone, raising its 12-month target price by 23% (68p) to 368p, citing "particularly encouraging hiring rates".
In November, Keystone floated at 160p per share, valuing it at about £50m. The firm has also paid out an interim dividend of 2.5p per share.
Firm founder and CEO James Knight said the results "give efficacy and weight to the business model as a whole", and attributed the growth to some "significant client wins" and the firm's recruitment strategy.
Between February and July, the firm brought in 42 new lawyers for a net headcount increase of 31, bringing total lawyer numbers up to 297. This included the addition of 10 senior lawyers during the summer from a range of City firms, including Ince & Co, Addleshaw Goddard, Squire Patton Boggs and Withers.
Knight told Legal Week: "More lawyers in the sweetspot of very successful careers are leaving that to join Keystone because of the benefits we offer, both financially and in terms of satisfaction and work/life balance. There is a greater focus on advising clients, rather than on being a political and bureaucratic system, which is what partner-orientated law firms are."
Keystone, which was established in 2002 and converted into an alternative business structure in 2013, began as a 'virtual' law firm, with its lawyers using technology to work from their own offices or homes. The firm then opened a string of offices across the UK as well as the Channel Islands and Australia.
"The results are a strong validation of the business, and reflect a growing acceptance of this way of working, and that it's starting to get into the legal profession. We're growing as fast as anyone else in the legal profession, excluding those growing through acquisition.
"The pool we operate in goes from startup companies through to public and bluechip. The mid-sector is a very significant area, and we have a lot of eggs in a lot of baskets, and that appeals to the stock market. When we originally floated it was very oversubscribed, but we've done well in terms of share price and have increased revenue in line with market expectations."
On the subject of Brexit, Knight remains sanguine: "The legal market takes on different shapes and forms. The majority of our clients are UK-domestic, and if it affects them, that's one thing. But I think that's a question more relevant to firms advising multinationals who may have to make some dramatic movements because of the effects of Brexit – deal or no-deal. Any business is affected.
"We're trying to deliver on what is estimated – to stick to our core function and deliver to market – but mainly its about delivering value to clients."
Finance director Ashley Miller added: "There will be lots of legal work following Brexit. We provide a full service to a large range of clients, and there will be challenges and opportunities regardless of the Brexit outcome."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250