Linklaters, Bakers and Travers among advisers as consortium mulls £2bn-plus Intu bid
Consortium including Peel Group and Brookfield sets sights on high-profile retail acquisition
October 05, 2018 at 08:51 AM
2 minute read
Linklaters, Kirkland & Ellis, Baker McKenzie and Travers Smith have all been drafted in to advise as as a consortium of investors mulls a possible multibillion-pound takeover of shopping centre owner Intu Properties.
Intu owns or part-owns 18 shopping centres across the UK, including two of Europe's biggest – Manchester's Trafford Centre and the Metrocentre in Gateshead.
Yesterday, investment firm Peel Group – which already owns a 27% stake in Intu – said a consortium also including Saudi-based investor Olayan Group and Canadian investment giant Brookfield was considering an offer for Intu, which the stock market currently values at about £2.5bn – adding that the offer is "at a preliminary and exploratory stage", and that "no approach has been made to the board of Intu".
Linklaters is advising Intu, fielding a team led by corporate partners Iain Wagstaff and William Buckley, while Travers is acting for longstanding client Peel Group, led by corporate finance head Neal Watson and M&A partner Philip Cheveley.
Bakers is advising Olayan with corporate finance partners Helen Bradley – who heads the department – and James Thompson leading the firm's team, while Kirkland is acting for Brookfield, fielding corporate partners Matthew Elliott and Mark Thompson.
The potential takeover follows a £3.4bn bid for Intu by property investor and Bullring owner Hammerson earlier this year, in a deal that could have created one of the country's largest property companies, worth about £21bn. The deal, however, fell through after Hammerson withdrew. Linklaters advised Intu while HSF took the lead role for longstanding client Hammerson.
In 2010, both Travers and Linklaters secured roles advising on the £1.6bn sale of the Trafford Centre, with Travers again taking the lead for sellers Peel Group and Linklaters advising Capital Shopping Centres Group, again led by Buckley.
Under the Takeover Code, now that the consortium has confirmed its intentions it has 28 days in which to make a formal offer, or else walk away.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
- 1SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
- 5KMPG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250