King & Wood Mallesons faces investigation after claims of overworking lawyers in Australia
Firm receives 'notice for improvement' from health and safety regulator regarding employee work conditions
October 15, 2018 at 01:31 PM
4 minute read
By John Kang
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) is under investigation by Australian authorities for allegedly overworking lawyers and staff in its Melbourne office.
The firm confirmed that it has received a notice for improvement from WorkSafe Victoria, the state occupational health and safety regulator, regarding employee work conditions that demanded overwork and gruelling conditions. This is the first time a law firm in Australia has been investigated for overworking lawyers.
The investigation is tied to KWM's involvement in a recent public inquiry into misconduct by dozens of the nation's financial services providers. A Royal Commission, led by former High Court Justice Kenneth Hayne QC, was formed in December 2017 to probe unethical practices, including the selling of highly risky financial products to vulnerable populations, such as the disabled.
As part of the Royal Commission probe, KWM has been representing wealth managers AMP and IOOF Holdings and insurers Suncorp Group and Youi, according to a report by the Australian Financial Review, to respond to government inquiries. Sydney-based AMP, whose chairwoman and chief executive stepped down as a result of that investigation, was hit worst by the inquiry, according to Reuters, losing $4bn in market value.
Other large law firms in Australia – Clayton Utz, Gilbert + Tobin, Herbert Smith Freehills and Ashurst – are also advising on the probe. Those firms have noted the work is arduous and said they are getting support from their offices around the globe to ensure their lawyers involved in the probe are not overworked.
The high volume of work has led junior lawyers at KWM's Melbourne office to be subject to gruelling work conditions, with some employees sleeping in the office so they could deal with tight deadlines and the huge volume of work, according to claims cited by the Australian Financial Review. The firm has until mid-November to respond to the WorkSafe investigations.
KWM Australia chief executive partner Berkeley Cox said the firm has been responding to the workload by hiring additional staff, putting lawyers on shifts and enlisting help from paralegals and clerks.
After receiving the WorkSafe notice, Cox said the firm is "undertaking a comprehensive review of what else we can do to better identify and prevent high-pressure situations for our people … [and] ensure our people are supported and are given regular and proper opportunities to rest and recover".
This kind of investigation by a state regulator into a law firm for overwork is a first for the Australian legal industry, and possibly a first in the Asia-Pacific region, noted Michael Tooma, an occupational health and safety expert and Australia managing partner of Clyde & Co.
"This is a wake-up call for the legal industry that we need to tackle this head-on," Tooma said. "It's a significant development. There will potentially be a precedent created for others."
KWM, together with 10 other major firms in Australia, previously signed a pledge in 2014 to a set of guidelines by the Tristan Jepson Memorial Foundation, now called Minds Count Foundation, and promised to create a psychologically healthy workplace. The foundation, which promotes psychological health and safety in law firms and the legal community, was originally named for an Australian lawyer who suffered from depression and committed suicide. The guidelines call for firms to make sure the amount of work that employees are expected to handle is reasonable for their positions.
Cox said the firm remains committed to the Minds Count Foundation guidelines. "We will be taking a fresh look at how the guidelines are applied in the context of unusual high-pressure situations, such as the recent Financial Services Royal Commission," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250